So, Andy, even though the 2.4, like the earlier designs, does control diffraction very well, its lower tweeter creates a time discrepancy between side and top diffraction. That effect would be extremely subtle, such that I would be surprised if I could ever hear it. But, your ears are younger than mine.Hi Tom,
The subject of diffraction is very controversial and there are people who believe that you "can't hear" diffraction and people would go on and on about it without agreeing on anything. Personally, although I don't know if you can "hear it", but I think diffraction manifests itself in how well the speaker images. Of course there are other variables such as cabinet stiffness, cabinet shape, but I think diffraction plays a big role.
I was wondering that the CS2.7 and CS3,7 being Thiel's latest designs, and the fact that the coax drivers were placed at the top of the baffle compared to older design, what was the main reason for that? Was it mainly to improve diffraction or was there other factors?
Thanks.