@andy2
I can probably find recordings as you describe but not able to compare to anything else in the near future. Any 3.7 owner want to bring your speakers to my room?
Interesting hypothesis regarding image density. That sounds plausible. Are your observations consistent in that respect? Yet another example that pretty every design comes with trade-offs.
The small midrange diaphragm on the 2.4, as Tom highlighted, is very nimble and lightweight, able to convey a delicacy. It’s been a year or two since I’ve heard a reference level speaker but I'm confident my modded 2.4s are top-shelf in terms of transparency and resolution. But the small drivers also can’t push as much air and that has its own sonic consequences.
I can probably find recordings as you describe but not able to compare to anything else in the near future. Any 3.7 owner want to bring your speakers to my room?
Interesting hypothesis regarding image density. That sounds plausible. Are your observations consistent in that respect? Yet another example that pretty every design comes with trade-offs.
The small midrange diaphragm on the 2.4, as Tom highlighted, is very nimble and lightweight, able to convey a delicacy. It’s been a year or two since I’ve heard a reference level speaker but I'm confident my modded 2.4s are top-shelf in terms of transparency and resolution. But the small drivers also can’t push as much air and that has its own sonic consequences.