@nonoise it clearly reads as a press release, TAS has a separate News tab full of press releases and this is filed under Equipment Reports. More likely a simple mistake rather than something more nefarious or lazy.
The Absolute Sound "review" of USB cable reads suspiciously like a press releaste
I mean c'mon—can't you even throw in a few according-to-the-manufacturer's?
http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/nordost-purple-flare-usb-cable/?mc_cid=1f41b2b3b4&mc_ei...
http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/nordost-purple-flare-usb-cable/?mc_cid=1f41b2b3b4&mc_ei...
- ...
- 92 posts total
I've read TAS for years and I get their email newsletter. The newest one just came today. The headline reads "
Reviews: KEF, Triangle, Nordost, Muraudio | Joe Lovano". The Nordost refers to the USB cable. It doesn't look like this is a mistake and it's pretty disturbing. I read both Stereophile and TAS and generally I trust their reviews. They are a tremendous help in buying used equipment that I cannot audition. This "review" blatantly crosses the line between an actual equipment report and a paid advertisement. Shame on TAS. |
@jond , Agreed. I've seen this type of thing many times before with other releases of new product. Sometimes, when perusing reviews at dailyaudiophile.com, I'll notice a few sites that have the very same mention of the very same product. Some don't even bother to change a word while others edit it slightly, to give their readers the impression that they were the ones to discover it. It looks like what TAS did put their spin on a simple press release. What I don't understand is some here getting a good case of the vapors. All the best, Nonoise |
@elliottbnewcombjr " Who among you believes the construction of a USB cable will make an audible difference?" You know, I would like to believe that it couldn't. But I just recently tried a different USB cable between my server to my DAC and it made an unmistakable difference, and all to the better. Like buying better DAC can. I don't like it, either, but there is no denying it, IME. It seems we need to fiddle with this cable, too, to tune our systems in. Oy. |
First in order to convince that USB cables do make a difference, people in the business have to be able to articulate at least in theory why would a USB cable would make a difference. Using common sense, if you can't prove that something on paper make a difference, then how can you convince that it would make a difference in real life or in practice. Here is a question posed to some of the more prominent cable designers in the industry and, at least IMO, after reading through all their responses, they can't seem to articulate why such USB cable would make a difference in theory. This comes from a HiFi+ article awhile ago. How do you answer those who argue that specialised digital cables don’t and can’t make a difference since digital audio is ‘all ones and zeros’ anyway? “(Laughs) No argument there—you would not be talking to an audiophile. The fact is that digital audio is ‘all ones zeros’ and time. In digital cables, clocking and time arrival integrity is crucial to musicality. When the timing aspects of digital cables are right, the sonic differences should be (and are) obvious, so if you can’t hear a difference, don’t buy the cable.” George Cardas of Cardas Audio “First, there is no music until something vibrates, electrically or acoustically. Second, in terms of cables, a digital cable “pulses” off and on quickly. If the cable does not vibrate in sync with the music signal, there will be errors. “ Bruce Brisson of MIT “I don’t argue this point. All cables affect the final sound of a system so if they don’t understand this, it’s obvious they have not listened or can’t overcome their negative expectation bias. Amusingly there is no such thing as a “one” or a “zero” where digital transfer through a cable is concerned. There is only an analogue signal, which is “interpreted” as a one or a zero, so there really is no difference between why analogue cables effect sound vs digital cables effecting sound. All cables affect sound in a system.” Ted Denney of Synergistic Research “Sit down and shut up and have a listen! Any digital cable (with the exception of optical cables) in a hi-fi system is carrying an electrical signal. That signal is as subject to interference and mechanical noise as any analogue cable is. We’ve already mentioned how critical we think the relationship between conductor and dielectric material is and if anything, this is more so when it comes to digital cables. For the same reason, the quality of shielding and the ability of that shielding to work at high frequencies are also critical. One of the areas of musical performance that digital cables seem to have a profound effect on is the coherence with which music is presented. Producing cables that are able to carry a musical signal coherently is, we think, fundamental to every cable design.” Nigel Finn of The Chord Company “It might start out as “all ones and zeros”, but the signal from the output must change from one to the other and the input device has to determine at which point a one becomes a zero and vice-versa. If a cable causes the voltage rise time to lag or linger it will cause problems.” Ray Kimber of Kimber Kable “Digital signal is ones and zeros, a lot of them! However, those who argue against the use of specialized digital cables overlook one exceedingly important factor which is the “timely conveyance” of all of those ones and zeros. In some digital components the lack of timely conveyance of digital signal is referred to as jitter. The electric current in all cables, by which digital information is conveyed, is impacted by conductivity, dielectric absorption, impedance, eddy current resistance and correspondingly the integrity of the timely conveyance of the massive amount of digital information is also altered. At the end of the day, I use the most sophisticated and precise test instrumentation in the world, the human hearing system. And, by that standard alone it is clear that different digital cables have a big impact on the sound.” John McDonald of Audience “The digital signals that are used in our audio equipment are not dissimilar to an analogue signal, only that they are constant amplitude but still constitute numerous frequencies. Exact representation of these frequencies in relation to triggering and lack of unwanted interferences influences the end result—the music that we hear. It is really the DAC that interprets the signal as ‘zeros & ones’. The signal itself is just made up of waves, albeit square waves.” Touraj Moghaddam of Vertere Acoustics “We are confident that we can demonstrate the positive differences that come through using our digital cables in music systems, making for a far more enjoyable listening experience.” Graham Nalty of Black Rhodium “We the only specialized manufacturer of HMDI and 4K UHD cables in North America, Nordost has put a lot of R&D into digital transmission. We have found that when digital cables are being used, it isn’t numerical 1s and 0s, but analog square waves that represent 1s and 0s that are actually being transferred. The “less square” a wave is, the harder it is for a DAC to make a distinction between the so-called 1s and 0s, which results in timing errors. In order to achieve sharp analog square waves, the cable must have a large bandwidth and be capable of high transmission speeds. Therefore, quality cable design makes a tremendous audible impact in digital cables.” Joe Reynolds of Nordost “I explain that those ones and zeros pass through cables as streamed waveforms with jitter that creates measurable data errors that change the sound we hear. I also offer to send them white papers published by test instrument manufacturers on that very issue.” David Salz of Wireworld “They’re correct in that the ones and zeros in the data remain ones and zeros through the connecting cable. Where it all goes to hell is when it’s converted to analog at the other end, and that is where the connecting cable and equipment interactions wreak havoc with the clarity of the sound. A digital source outputs data, and noise. The quality of the cable determines both the integrity of the data and how noise travels. Today’s digital gear should be looked upon as an RF system and while designed to play through faults, the quality of the analog output, particularly the very low-level signal portions that brings about a sense of space and other life-like qualities, is highly dependent on the care taken in the transport of the digital signal. Resolution is not black and white, but rather shades of grey.” Joe Skubinski of JPS Labs “The zeros and ones are not the problem. It is about jitter and noise causing a different sound. Jitter causes timing errors, easily heard as an unpleasant sonic effect.” Edwin and Gabi Rijnveld of Siltech and Crystal Cable |
- 92 posts total