Frank,
The exact same argument you just gave is made for psychics, faith healers, new age therapies, spiritualists and alternative medicine and pretty much every dubious claim you can find. People’s subjectivity can “confirm” the efficacy of just about anything anyone has dreamed up.
Thats actually a problem - a bug, not a feature - of human psychology to take in to consideration when it comes to staking claims on “what people think they experienced.”
And there are limited ways of trying to avoid dealing with this problem of separating real world properties vs human imagination. The most common is to put the blame on the person skeptical of the claim: they either don’t have the secret power or mindset to detect what others detect, or they just don’t have he appropriate opennes of mind to get the experience.
If you feel that pull toward that type of “explanation” when there is no objective evidence for a claim, consider the company you keep with that excuse. ;-)
The exact same argument you just gave is made for psychics, faith healers, new age therapies, spiritualists and alternative medicine and pretty much every dubious claim you can find. People’s subjectivity can “confirm” the efficacy of just about anything anyone has dreamed up.
Thats actually a problem - a bug, not a feature - of human psychology to take in to consideration when it comes to staking claims on “what people think they experienced.”
And there are limited ways of trying to avoid dealing with this problem of separating real world properties vs human imagination. The most common is to put the blame on the person skeptical of the claim: they either don’t have the secret power or mindset to detect what others detect, or they just don’t have he appropriate opennes of mind to get the experience.
If you feel that pull toward that type of “explanation” when there is no objective evidence for a claim, consider the company you keep with that excuse. ;-)