New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
The two new Omega + E-Mats in the circuit breaker box continue the break-in process, sounding better with each passing day. 

I was just listening to Sammy Davis Jr. with  Laurindo Almeida (Guitar) on the DCC reissued CD. Just unbelievable. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/SAMMY-DAVIS-JR-Sings-LAURINDO-ALMEIDA-Plays-1991-DCC-DZS-055-FACTORY-SEALED-CD/264449199691?epid=1624550085&hash=item3d92668e4b:g:7~oAAOSwkpxdavGN

This one is expensive, but the LP sounds terrific and so does the standard CD. 

Frank
jay23,
Recently I met a young mastering engineer from Bklyn who worked with the renowned Bob Ludwig.  He said that at 72, Ludwig had excellent ears and taught the younger proteges what to listen for.  It is likely that Ludwig has diminished HF acuity, but he certainly has judgment about what he does hear.  He could still have excellent hearing in the midrange, where the most critical things occur.  This reminds me of some renowned elderly violin teachers I have had, who have pointed out things I overlooked.  So take Frank (oregonpapa).  An audiogram would probably show deficiencies, but he is a sophisticated and experienced music lover who knows what to listen for.  

25 years ago, I recorded for fun, using 2 Neumann KM184 mikes in approximate ORTF style, that's it.  I placed them very close, just behind the conductor's head or very close in string quartet ensembles, etc.  My recordings were very immediate, unlike most commercial ones with ambience, etc.  I wanted to emulate my favorite recordings of Donald Johanos conducting the Dallas Symphony in Rachmaninoff Symphonic Dances and Copland Rodeo on 2 concurrent LPs on Turnabout from 1967.  These recordings have direct impact.  There is tremendous detail without the muddy effects of ambience.  After this recording of the Rachmaninoff, I cannot listen to other recordings which lose impact while trying to bathe everything in ambience.  In a way, these Turnabout recordings produce sound that is "in the room," but they have the maximum clarity, detail and impact.  

So, I would like to hear your objective findings, good or bad, about the PPT products you have tried in familiar systems.
Frank,

So no sign of jay23.....well, I am not surprised at all.

Grab a glass of wine and listen to Harlem Nocturne by Illinois Jacquet....i bet your system is just as magical as this essential Jacquet 😊


I’m curious how the new + mat would compare to doubling up the original. If I understand right the + mat performs identical to the original only with greater intensity? But then is it twice as potent as the original? Maybe right now the better bang for the buck is multiplying the originals?
Good question, lpretiring.  Krissy of PPT would have a background comparison on that.