Another Music Direct Catalog observation


I didn't want to hijack an existing thread about the current catalog's Joni cover so I started this one.

You know, I was thinking about this after I received my catalog and how burned out I was on "boomer music". I know as a Gen Xer, I've been saturated by Boomer culture since I came of age in the 80's, and my appreciation for these artists has waned in part because of their saturation in audiophile circles.

Yes, the MD catalog does pay lip service to contemporary artists, but its adherence to a musical paradigm that peaked 45 years ago or so is symptomatic of the undeniable waning of "hi-fi" as a hobby.
128x128simao
I listen primarily to Classical Music.  For a variety of reasons, after World War II most newly composed Music has had trouble entering the canon of basic repertoire.  Most of the energy of discovery or rediscovery has been on Composers that were outside the acknowledged Masters— first Late Romanticists such as Mahler and Bruckner, then with the Historical Informed Period Practice (HIPP) movement, Baroque and Pre Baroque composers.  When I attend a Concert and a new contemporary piece is on the program, everyone in the audience seems to grit their teeth for the ordeal—faces remind me of being at the Dentist office in the pre Novacaine days—and then we relax and wait for the next Warhorse to begin.
  The OP describes what to me seems an analogous situation.  The great Pop Music of about a 30 year span has achieved canonical status.  And while I am aware that new Pop Artists are always amongst us and selling out concerts and downloads, I think everyone here would agree that the scene doesn’t remotely resemble the halcyon days of yore.  Classical Concerts resemble Audio Museums, and the Music Direct Catalog, which in these days of the extinction of stores that sell Physical Media represents an important source of such media, is the Pop equivalent of the Classical scene.
It’s about time we got in charge of the musical culture. We had to listen to endless pop jazz treacle when we were coming up. Your kids will have the same complaints about your music soon enough.

By the way that was a beautiful picture of Joni Mitchell, wasn’t it? Don’t disagree and make me have to slap you around in front of your GenX friends. The should be more vintage pictures of Michelle Phillips and Linda Ronstadt too, not more unnecessary GenX stuff. Don’t worry, you’ll have your day sooner than you think.

Mike
Hey - I agree that both the picture of Joni is quite incredible and that Joni herself was an incredible artist. I still occasionally revel in her Court and Spark, or her Blue album. And Hancock's "River" release was a fitting testament to her power.

It's just that these artists have been the pantheon for close to fifty years, and those who insist on fallacies that the best music was made in that era seem to be in denial that culture has moved on.
To know the past is imperative. To cling to it is to fade away.
The one thing I know for sure is that today's artists have moved away from the wall of sound developed by Phil Spector and I miss that sound a great deal. Multiple instruments playing the same part, brass and woodwinds, strings over the top, and backup singers calling back or repeating what the lead sang. To my ear, the wall of sound adds so much interest to a song and I can find myself ignoring the lead and singing the backup parts (I could have been a Pip). Speaking of the Pips, the wall of sound technique was also incorporated into a great deal of Motown recordings as well. Today's music just sounds so stripped down that it doesn't hold my interest, even if the melody is decent.
Much of today's pop music also sounds very similar, because it seems like to be a hit a song has to fit into a more and more narrowly defined structure of what constitutes a hit. I'm a boomer and of course I'm biased, but I think the period of 1972-1975 had so many different styles of what was acceptable to be a hit. You had the folk rock of the Eagles and Jackson Browne, the soft rock of America and Bread, the hard rock of Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, and The Who, the pop rock of the Carpenters and Elton John, the glam rock of Bowie, and the progressive rock of Pink Floyd, Yes, Rush, and Jethro Tull, as well as a huge number of Motown acts. They were experimenting and developing and unlike today, were given more than just one album to develop their sounds. 
Is there good music still being made today? Absolutely, but it's not what's being played on the radio and it's much more difficult to find. The one suggestion I have for people seeking good music is to look past the hit songs of even these artists from the period I mentioned and try to find deeper cuts because many of those deeper cuts are great as well. I find it kind of sad that even classic rock radio stations of today all have such small playlists. There's some great stuff from 1972-1975 that didn't make it big on the radio but still deserves a chance to be heard.