SACD or not

Tomcy, no ill  will intended, but reading back your posts it isn’t sufficiently clear to me that you are saying that Classical SACDs can be had at more reasonable rates non Classical.  Anyway , I think that we are in agreement there, now that I better understand you.
  I only own 2 non Classical SACDS, Kind of Blue and an earlier SACD incarnation of Sgt Pepper (I understand that the latest remastering of Sgt. Pepper is an improvement).  If those 2 discs are indicative of non Classical SACD, I would agree that they don’t have much to offer compared to Redbook 

We’re in agreement, mahler, and I buy and listen to nonclassical SACDs.  But it's hard to recommend that someone on a tight budget start a nonclassical SACD collection at this point.

https://forum.audiogon.com/posts/1834132?highlight=Reference%2BRecordings%2B

As I posted above, they've now been nominated 2020 Grammy's



 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 Reference Recordings Is Proud to Announce 11 GRAMMY® Nominations Across 8 Categories! 

It seems that the OP doesn't own SACDs. I am in agreement with the post by Chayro. I would purchase a dedicated CD player or transport with DAC. At that budget the best way to get the most from his CD collection.

There is no problem getting any kind of music style on SACD. All you have to do is know what you are looking for and then go to a place which sells them, like Acoustic Sounds:  https://store.acousticsounds.com/c/8/Hybrid_SACDs
or
Music Direct:
https://www.musicdirect.com/music/optical-disc?category=Optical%2520Disc&format=Hybrid%2520SACD&...
Etc...…………...