Moving cables around killed dynamics for days anyone else experience this?

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".
For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory. 
And for "moron audiophiles" everything is exactly opposite. If an experiment (and the experiment in audio it is listening test) disproves theory, they don't believe to their ears. 
I listened a number of systems of such "moron audiophiles" and saw how this  believe in their "scientific theories" leaded them to horrible results!

alexberger

I will go in the same way as you, some walk their illusory and not very humble walks with sometimes vast amount of knowledge, but poor scientific judgement, too much faith and trust in apparatus and available theories and way less in their too human error prone ears... Technical science is useful and necessary, but in their faillible way, even subject to errors, the ears are more important than all dogmas or even facts, because we listen with the ears and it is the ultimate fact that superseded the other facts in importance...

Musical bliss can be and must be produce for sure by a good technical embedding of the audio system, but at the end, the way to increase it more, is not always linked to actual technical known, proved facts...More than that, what is the audible truth for one is anathema for another sometimes... Too much variable to makes rules without many exceptions here...I dont even speak about the many possible personal choices...

Musical bliss is first an individual experience before being or beginning to be a scientific fact, if it is ever....

alexberger

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".

Logical fallacy, ad hominem attack times two. Not only do you call those audiophiles with whom you disagree morons, you also label them as fanatics.

Perhaps the difference between audiophiles and those you call "real scientists" is that the audiophiles tend to report their experiences, while those like you engage in illogic and insult.

For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory.

If so, that’s a poor scientist. "An experiment" can neither prove nor disprove any theory. It’s just one experiment. For the results to have any scientific validity, the experiment must then be replicated by others, and the results shared and assessed.

I have to wonder why you’re here if you think we’re morons.

Perhaps the word " morons" was a bit too much...I dont like also ad hominem attack...I like to discuss opinions not insulting anybody...I say that to distance myself  to the use of the word "morons"... 

Forgetting science versus the human ear discussions, keeping it simple, I would be surprised if simply removing and reinserting the same cables could cause this difference in sound.  I would think some other variable has changed.