alexberger
Perhaps the difference between audiophiles and those you call "real scientists" is that the audiophiles tend to report their experiences, while those like you engage in illogic and insult.
I have to wonder why you’re here if you think we’re morons.
There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".Logical fallacy, ad hominem attack times two. Not only do you call those audiophiles with whom you disagree morons, you also label them as fanatics.
Perhaps the difference between audiophiles and those you call "real scientists" is that the audiophiles tend to report their experiences, while those like you engage in illogic and insult.
For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory.If so, that’s a poor scientist. "An experiment" can neither prove nor disprove any theory. It’s just one experiment. For the results to have any scientific validity, the experiment must then be replicated by others, and the results shared and assessed.
I have to wonder why you’re here if you think we’re morons.