Evolution Acoustics MMMicroOne

I think MicroOne marketing is not one centered on pricing, but rather focusing more towards competing products, and is pre-dorminantly result oriented. In all fairness, they have to use at least equal caliber gears (ideally same) with which their competitors are using in order to equally shine at shows and show off their best, how else?

All that said, I as a consumer, would be more concern of how the MicroOnes actually sound in comparison to those said $25-35k competitors. If at all 'near', or as many people claim to even surpass, then at $2.5k, we got ourselves a true audio bargain, a joyous news, and a refreshing break in the high end world--regardless of how it was demo'ed.. imo.

Prairie wind blowing through my head...

Doc77, I have never heard the Evolution Acoustics speakers but everyone keeps raving about the sound....except for you. I typically read a poster's other threads to get an idea about their listening likes and dislikes.

I'm not saying you are not correct in your opinion HOWEVER you only have 4 posts in these forums and they are all touting Vapor speakers. Are you in any way affiliated with Vapor audio? I've never heard Vapor speakers either, I'm sure they are fine speakers. ALOT of ears....well trained ears repeatedly pick the Evolution Acoustics/JTinn rooms at shows among their best of show.....show in, show out. I'm just curious about your affiliation with Vapor.

Stereo Mojo.com says the MM Micro One sounds better than the Magico Q1 in their RMAF Show review. Having attended this show and hearing both speakers(different systems, but both very expensive) I`d agree the Evolution speaker was much better and certainly more involving and natural.

I would assume at a cost factor 10x higher the Magico used more expensive parts. So itemizing various parts/prices is`nt always an accurate way to judge the finished product. DOC77 what`s the point in focusing on the individual speaker part cost? Ultimately the ability to reproduce music well is the only meaningful objective.

I was just about to mention that Stereomojo show report. Everyone should read it, simply for the pure entertainment, compared to other show reporting which is basically just listing the room and gear without giving opinion regarding the sound.

Anyway... they did point out the MMMicro One was a better sounding speaker than the Magico Q1, and the Magico did use much more expensive upstream equipment.

But I am with Robsker on the opinion good amplification can make average speakers sound fantastic, and a Dartzeel integrated amp is not chump change.