Evolution Acoustics MMMicroOne

One two bashings - likely na', probably motives driven.
Three four five six - umm.. just maybe.
Many?? - sounds to me like a consensus of that product's ability.
Can't be conspiracy can it?
Have not heard both, but the MMMicroOne sure perks my interest.

Djanggo,

Sure. No motives, whatsoever... Just some greenish halo.

>> Can't be conspiracy can it?

Only when it come to the press. How else would you explain all these false accolades.

Usermanual,
"Magico bashing" or just simply people honestly expressing their opinions after hearing and comparing various speakers.
Wirhout question there were those at RMAF who thought the Q1 was good or even great sounding (not me). Taste and preference are what they are.

I think what struck many listeners is that for 25K the Q1 was not impressive and in fact in their opinion this speaker was out performed dy considerably less costly speakers under similar show conditions.

Some will find the Q1 superb and a very fair value, if that`s the case then I say go for it.
At 1/10 the cost I found the Micro One to sound superior, at the very least I can say the system sounds better than the Magico room/system.

It you really like the Magico and trust your ears, why would you care about other`s contrary impressions ?

Looks like the Magico Q1 will be to standmount speakers what Nordost Valhalla was to cable builders. A high dealer margin product to aspire and beat for a much cheaper cost.

My comments were made after some of Jtinn remarks here, and in other posts as well. Not just regarding Magico, but other competing brands to the assortment of products he represent. It is not about "people honestly expressing their opinions ". It is about representatives of competing brands. I find it a bit tasteless, that is all.