TRL Marantz Sa-14



After speaking to Paul at TRL I am very curious to hear from those who own this unit what improvements do you hear with the player before and after the mod.

The SA-14 sounds weak in the bass and has no dynamics in comparison to some players like the Sony Scd-1 in stock form. Has anyone compared the TRL Sa-14 to the Sony Scd-1?
la45
Lawyerman-

Of course Marantz will tell you that- what are they supposed to say? All companies will claim their flagship is SOTA and the benchmark for years to come :)

Glad you are enjoying your SA 1. I see from previous threads that you state you sold a $22K Wadia setup for your SA1 and you have a $200K system. You must really like it. Surprisingly, there are a couple SA 1's sitting on AGON right now pretty cheap and have been there for weeks.. Somebody should grab one.
LaFish is a pretty reputable seller.

By the way, when did you get your SA14 modded by TRL? Did you listen to it stock before you sent it on to TRL?
Many people tend to think the SA14, either version 1 or 2 pretty much barked in stock form. What version do you have?
Howard: The SA-1 is good in its stock form, but in my experience, I'm not going to rush out to buy one ... I'm quite happy with my TRL modded SA-14. :)

Other players and DACs have came along that have surprised the TRL mod team, like Tony's (Clio09) Audio Mirror DAC. Having heard it myself, I couldn't believe how good it was, (even stock). Anyone looking for a DAC in the $500-$600 price range should definitely include the Audio Mirror to their short list. Then, of course, send it off for the final finishing touches. Once modded, the Audio Mirror isn't far from the SA-14. This is based on my first hand experience in TRL's listening room, with full TRL cables, the TRL ST-225 integrated and Paul's Magico speakers. Transport used that time was one of Paul's modded Masterlinks.

My point? Since TRL has done so many mods this past year, it is quite possible that they will find other players that may not be all that impressive stock that will mod into a very good player. Since they are in this position, I'll take their word on it ...

And, of course, Howard, I'll be happy to send along any info that comes my way ... :) I have already planned out my week so that I can have time to drop by the shop and hear your player as well as a few others.

Best,

Jack

Lithojoe-

Which player beats the TRL SA-14?? I will let you know. My plan is to compare it to two Sony players, one is modified and the other is in stock form. After that I have a friend who does have the stock Marantz SA-1 that I mentioned earlier (love this player).

I refuse to enter into a "shootout" with other players in the mix. The biggest problem is there is no standard testing procedure in place. If we were to select one important criteria for determining the superiority of a product perhaps we can use the "Neutral" term.

But the closest I have ever heard a "neutral system" was at Sony headquarters testing facility where I heard a special crossoverless design speaker system in an anechoic chamber. It was so impressive that I could not describe the sound to you. Its nothing I have ever heard both or since at home or at a live concert event. Therefore I have concluded that this must be what a neutral system should be.

Jack,

I think the combination of the TRL Audio Mirror with the TRL Alesis Masterlink is one that is a match made in heaven. Having said that I have also heard the TRL Audio Mirror with a Sound Odyssey modified Music Hall CD-25. The result was very good, but a bit more analytical than my ears would prefer. I wasn't aware Paul was using a modified Alesis in his listening set-up as well. Now with the TRL ST-225 amp on the way I guess I need to look into Magico speakers. I swore I would never sell my Spendor's, then again I swore I would never give up my tube amp. Technically I still haven't, but I fear the ST-225 is eventually going to nudge it out of my rotation if indications from others who are using the ST-225 is a gauge for how good it is.

Tony