How does adding a second subwoofer improve your systems SQ?

Erik, you are fixated on your grievances towards audiophiles who prefer something which is arguably

Man who keeps calling me out upset I reply.

Sadly for you I don’t owe you a debate nor do I do research for free. The proof is in the archives. I don’t even know who "Big Greg" is, but honestly don’t care if he thinks I disdain him, so go find yourself a tin whistle and blow it. I would appreciate it if you’d stop deliberately misreading me to claim things not in recent evidence, then attempt to exhaust me with requests for free research. For some one who claims an advanced degree I’m surprised reading comprehension wasn’t actually taught at your schools.

You’ve stated I’ve attempted to discredit the technology. Nowhere is that in evidence. I, again, clarified. Now you want me to prove the behavior I’m objecting to. Puhleese. I don't play the  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man merry go round you seem enamored of here.

I suggest you go hawk your products as much as you want to, and name me only if you want my attention. Capiche?

Quote me.

@erik_squires, speaking of straw men and/or reading comprehension, you wrote:

" You’ve stated I’ve attempted to discredit the technology."

No I did not.

I provided TWO quotes wherein you called multi-sub advocates "cultists", and then in a follow-up post I wrote:

" Since bass trap advocate Erik Squires is playing the "cultist" card to discredit multi-sub advocates..."

So I never said that you attempted to discredit the technology, only its advocates. Of course if its advocates are "cultists", with everything that word implies (brain-washed, simple-minded, etc.), that doesn’t exactly bode well for the technology, does it?

Regarding your list of three accusations:

It is the easiest thing in the world to make accusations on an internet forum. They cost you nothing and potentially cost the accused a great deal...

Unless you are asked to back up your accusations, because then your credibility is being challenged.

How about this: You stop the name-calling and drive-by accusations and I’ll leave you alone.

Duke

This thread is so on note for this forum it’s been a joy to read.

" You’ve stated I’ve attempted to discredit the technology."

No I did not.

I provided TWO quotes wherein you called multi-sub advocates "cultists", and then in a follow-up post I wrote:

You cannot understand the difference between objecting to how people promote a technology to discrediting it, and I guess we’ll have to leave it at that, and this mindless promotion of this take is rather... religious. If you want any proof just go back through the archives and look for Miller Carbon and "Toole" unless that discussion got deleted by the moderator.

How about this, your cadre leaves me the eff alone and behaves themselves and I won’t call them out for what they are? Should I call you something else besides Duke? Maybe supreme speaker? Arch bishop? Duke seems so secular.



Erik

Erik,

If I started referring to those who advocate bass traps as "flat earthers", would I not be discrediting the technology? Same thing when you refer to those who advocate multiple subs as "cultists".

Erik, IF you have a beef with Miller Carbon, THEN you have a beef with Miller Carbon. To extrapolate your dispute with him to everyone who advocates multiple subs is unreasonable and unwise, as it fills your world with perceived enemies.

And let’s not resort to making fun of each other’s names. You have an unfair advantage; your name is instantly cool without even trying to be.

Duke