Can a McIntosh MC7205 handle Polk Audio RTi A9’s?


I’m building my dream system with mostly used parts. I purchased the MC7205 to replace my McIntosh MC-58 amp for more power. I also ordered a pair of RTi A9. I’ve read in many reviews that said they need an amp with minimum 200w/ch. the Mac 7205 only puts out 120w/ch x 5.  If anyone is familiar with this amp or speakers, please I welcome any feedback. Thanks
cody57
Thanks for all the advice. I read where the 7205 can’t be bridged, but how would I bi-amp them?  I guess I got myself in a pickle. I upgraded from a McIntosh MC58 bridged to 100w/ch that was powering a pair of TSi 500’s and I have to turn up the volume to half the power in HT tv to hear it. On music I notice the TSi 500’s don’t come alive until I turn the volume on the mc58 half way. I’m afraid it’ll be the same or worse with the MC 7205 and the Polk A9’s. 
I checked out bi-amping briefly. Tell me if I’m wrong.  I can biamp channel 1 & 2 and channels 3 & 4 to the RTi A9’s’ and channel 5 to the center RTi a6. I can use my MC-58 bridged to power the TSi 500s surrounds and the remaining 2 channels(30w) ea. To power 2 TSi 100’s or Monitor 40’s. It sounds too easy, where did I go wrong?
If I used my mac58 bridged to send 100w to the HF terminals and my Mac7205 for the LF terms on the RTi A9s and the surrounds. Would that work and would it give me more power for the Polk RTiA9s?
Your getting the idea.. See what sounds the best, and hopefully, not have to add a passive preamp (29-79.00). The less in the sound path the better, especially the mids and highs.

It would be better if you had bass control, over control of the highs. TOO much amp is better than not enough. BUT SQ is gonna be good with either amp. The leftover channel could run a passive sub, or center. I’m not a center speaker guy, so if needed a, passive bass bin.

Regards
Post removed