2. analog
  3. 158794-133138

Pondering to pull the trigger on an AT VM 760SLC

Hello... I am going to take a second pass in a different forum... My last post was similar, but I have somewhat  fine tuned my note and questions here...

I am wanted to pull the trigger on an AT VM760SLC.  I think my apprehension is just and I'd like to get a bit of feedback. As I have shared...I have a Dual 1219 and a Grado Platinum 1.  I do remember back in the day about 1976 I bought an AT 14 and I was so impressed by the round tones and higher highs.  I want to hear that again...yes I want rounder, sweeter, candy-coated sound...I admit it....while my tinnitus is probably a factor. :)  All those trips to the Los Angeles Forum as a kid.

Is the AT VM760SLC  a substantial step-up from the Grado Platinum 1 in the tonal quality that I seek?  My concern is whether the Dual 1219 TT can really handle this new cartridge...allowing it to perform as it should.  I am also thinking about that all-important 92 degree set-up.  Is that a factor that can be met with the old-school Dual? Would I need shims to compensate?  Or does the 92 degree issue only apply to higher end MC cartridges?  And...lastly...does a platter mat help to calibrate that 92 degree issue and affect set-up overall?

Go ahead...I can take it...  I love my Dual... but, it is from an older age; as are my Yamaha separates - M-70, C-70.

As far as speakers... yeah...I'm the guy with the Cerwin Vega's D8's...bigger rounder tones, that I  like. And  I am thinking that the AT VM760SLC may compensate for the CV's lesser/subdued highs. 

I could do another post about how I was not impressed by the various models of Klipsch speakers heard at Best buy / Magnolia.   Another day...

Please...any input would be helpful...

Thank you.

vinylspin
vinylspin
tablejockey
3,904 posts
 
"The old days, one could go to a number of Los Angeles stereo chain stores...Federated, Pacific Stereo, Now Sound, Rogers Sound Labs, Cal Stereo...and so many others."
http://www.pacificstereo.net/store.jpg

Remember the great ads in the Sunday LA Times Calendar section?
You forgot University Stereo.

Since you’re willing to spend that much, consider this also
https://www.sound-smith.com/cartridges/fixed-coil/otello
Very nice and you can get it rebuilt for a reasonable price.

I have one as a backup for the "serious" cartridge
elliottbnewcombjr
5,405 posts
 
tablejockey

MC is an expensive move, and OP, like me for many years is highly resistant to MC.

there is no way I would have moved into any new cartridge with elliptical stylus, certainly not MC elliptical stylus like that Soundsmith.

Like you, I might keep it, and, if not inclined for a separate mono cartridge, elliptical is better for mono lp grooves.
vegasears
1,173 posts
 
Won't say much about the cartridge but thanks for the trip down memory lane.  I grew up in the South bay and later lived in the Valley. I still have an AT-14Sa and really enjoy it's Shibata tip.  I also have a AT-150MLX and use it with the Microline stylus that came with it but I also use it with an ATN150Sa Shibata stylus.  It's nice having the ability to switch stylus without the doing the set up thing.
tablejockey
3,904 posts
 
"MC is an expensive move, and OP, like me for many years is highly resistant to MC."

uh...if you take the time to read about it, it's a $400 entry level moving iron cart that is compatible in a MM phonostage.

elliottbnewcombjr
5,405 posts
 
tablejockey

sorry, I missed the fact it is MI, I saw 'coil' in my quickie look, however it is Elliptical, my main reason to rule it out.

It does illustrate what I found when researching: MI theoretically should have terrific channel separation and channel balance, but, unless you get WAY UP in price, the specs are not so good,

channel separation only 20-24db; channel balance 1.8db; frequency response +/- 2.5db, that's a 5db swing,

It may sound terrific, you and many may love it, I simply would not go with elliptical. 




More to discover