A pragmatic view of cartridge expenses / many questions


Trying to see what your thoughts are on cartridge expenses? Do you buy cartridges and replace or retip after it’s worn? Cartridges are like tires for cars in some ways. You have to replace the tires after they wear out.

If you own an ultra expensive cartridge, let’s say, over 7k, is that your main spinner? Do you do a factory retip at costs exceeding thousands? Do some of you who own high cost cartridges use them only for special occasions, similar to drinking Dom Perigon for some special event, and use a normal not so exotic cartridge for regular day to day use and perhaps non-audiophile records.
I am sure each of us have our own price threshold and thoughts of high end cartridges. I only said 7k, because that seems to me a fair price point to describe a very expensive cartridge.

My thoughts are that having a few normally priced cartridges around is a good thing, due to the wear and tear, and replacing or retippimg would also be less costly. I do lust after some high end cartridges and if I do obtain one, my philosophy would be as described above. Enjoy for special occasions, and use a less costly for normal day to day listens. Geez, it feels like we are trying to separate our car cruises from a sports car feel to a luxury limo ride feel, in some ways. 
What’s your opinion on expendability of cartridges?
audioquest4life
@mijostyn,

”experience is always the best teacher.” I absolutely agree on this statement. 
Dear @audioquest4life : The resonance frequency using the V with the LPS is lower than 8hz and using the Jade is over 12hz.

mijostyn touched a critical issue that we have to take care carefully if we want true quality performance high levels.

The Jade and LPS can’t show to you their true quality performance, yes it can sounds but that’s all .
You prefer the Soundsmith over the LPS and is because you are given the SS what it needs and you did not give what the LPS is asked for.
Your cartridges compariason is not totally fair between the SS and LPS and certainly not even to the VDH. In the other side I hope that you make your comparisons at the same SPLs because our ears are extremely sensible even to 0.1db differences.

@lewm normally that VDH model comes with internal 13 ohms, so loading at 20 ohms is out of question but he is just testing it . Btw, even that is hiper-analytical and that's why I posted exist an overall set up problem.

aq4l, if you are using the I/O then exist a critical problem to fulfill any LOMC cartridge and does not matters those 80db on gain because this kind of gain figure is achieved through at least 5 different circuit stages where the cartridge signal must pass through and where at each one is degraded our beloved audio signal and that overall degradation means: higher noise levels added at each circuit stage, added, distortions, added..., added...,. and the I/O inverse eq. is an additional problem.

All those if you are using the I/O but if not then never mind.

Only trying to help in objective way, not a subjective as you said.

R.
Thanks, Raul.  As you may recall, I once owned a Colibri, and it occurred to me that it and most other VDH LOMC cartridges I know about do or did not have particularly low internal resistance, which is what one would want if loading at 20 ohms.  But listening tests are the most important criteria.
@lewm : the I/O has 1Kohms as output impedance and the RIAA frequency deviation has a swing of a very high 0.5db. So it’s not only the VDH loading but this issues too that impedes the VDH showed at its best. I know very well the I/O even the 4 chasis one.

R.