Qobuz vs Tidal


First off in the last 3 weeks, I have lost 90% of my vision so if there are mistakes please understand.  I am building my last house and will be moving in in late August.  I have ordered a fantastic two channel system, and I have a separate theater room.   The 2 channel system consists of Canary Audio Grand Reference Two Mono Amps, Canary C1800 Pre-amp, Lumin X1 Dac/Streamer, and an Inakustic 3500P power conditioner and Viking Accoustic Grande Voix horn speakers.  My theater room will include a 5.2.2 set up of Tekton Double impact in wall speakers.   My music source is a Lumin X-1 with a 4tb Synology NAS filled with over 10,000 titles.  In my last system I used Tidal to complement my digital library.  I am looking for either Qobuz or Tidal  for my new system.  I am looking for people who have both or have used both.  Which do you prefer and why?   If you have only used one please don't reply.  I need your help as I can no longer research the way I would like.  All your replies will be voice activated so that is how I am getting your information.  Ease of use will be critical due to my sight restrictions.  Thanks for your help.
willgolf
@decooney

by the sound, it seems there is some add’l processing going on with the tidal stream

it is a little more tizzy, less warm, slightly phasey in comparison to quboz

or is quboz just processing differently? don’t think we will ever know
Post removed 
@dannad
For just regular HD (CD quality), I don't think there is any difference. 

dannad, 
Nope, not talking MQA. Don't use MQA, prefer not to. Yes, hearing a difference for sure. Yes, specifically talking "regular HD CD quality" - FLAC Lossless only and yes, hearing a worthy difference.  

re: Tidal vs. Qobuz sound with CD quality tracks (16/44.1) only;  

Update:
Checked with a few critical-listener colleagues today who are using my exact same MHDT DAC (16-bit R2R Ladder tube design) and (both with similar type all-tube audio systems) hear a distinguishable difference at CD quality level with Qobuz vs. Tidal. Both report it's not the same to them either.  In fact, one switched from Tidal to Qobuz today as a result sampling 3 well regarded albums.  He indicated "instantly hearing a quality improvement with Qobuz over Tidal with regular CD bit/transfer rate". And, he too is a long term Tidal consumer like me.  We are now of the belief Tidal is doing something during digital transfer to alter even CD tracks, somehow. Will need to read up more on Tidal's software engine.   

Listening now:
Just sampled several tracks I've played for the past year with Tidal Hi-Fi. With Qobuz there is this a notable naturalness to strings and voices - more similar to CD through my same DAC with a tad more enjoyable tone and texture there. I use string/eectric guitar and piano keys as a reference too. My ear is particularly tuned to these instruments, fwiw.  


TIN PAN ALLEY - Stevie Ray Vaughan:
>>Listen to this track on Spotify Premium, then Tidal Hi-Fi, then Qobuz Studio Premier and compare<<.  Qobuz is simply more natural to me. 

LANDSLIDE - Fleetwood Mac (2017 Remastered):
>>Listen to the tone of the strings and texture of her voice and compare<<. High strings offer a very nice tone and timbre on Qobuz. 

Qobuz Studio Premier is nice.  It also could be our MHDT DACs are helping to realize the difference in 16-bit FLAC. It’s not smeared with Qobuz CD-FLAC quality, at all.  I don’t know what it is, but really like it.  Tried Amazon, will revisit quarterly. Thought for sure Amazon would dominate soon, not yet IMO. 

Glad to see the competition with streaming services heating back up!  



Post removed 
the sound difference i described pertains to non MQA Tidal feed vs Quboz Hi Res