Direct Drive vs. Idler Drive vs. Belt drive

Dear friends : I want to return to that " supposed "/hipothetic DD servo " problem and I want to do it because @mikelavigne  was very emphatic about in this thread.

This what Mike posted:

"""   when we consider belts, idlers, and direct drive........2 of those have the choice of no servo’s.

i’ve owned a number of top flight direct drive turntables; including the Rockport Sirius III, the SP-10 Mk2 and Mk3, and now the Wave Kinetics NVS for the last 9 years. taken singularly; none of those were obviously lacking in speed solidity and musical flow. but over these last 6-9 months, in direct side by side comparison to the Saskia model two idler, and the CS Port LFT1 Belt drive, neither of which have servo’s......this idea of the human ear hearing the musical cost of feedback is very real.

execution of an idler or belt to the degree to take full advantage of the lack of feedback is paramount, but when you do your ’ears’ will thank you.
but the separator turns out to be the lack of servo on the belt and idler. i’m drawn to those two emotionally more. now that i’ve lived with those i’m always conscious of that aspect of my NVS direct drive.  ""



and this my answer I posted to him:

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/direct-drive-vs-idler-drive-vs-belt-drive/post?postid=1952212...

He in very plite way as usual from himjust tell me he disagree totally with what I posted.


In what I posted in wbf things were that the gentleman ( that's an American Sound distributor ) posted there that the only DD he likes is the DP-100 that comes with servo control, this goes against his TT servo " repulsion. ).

Today no one can't prove that the servo control in DD TT develops a " problem " that we can hear, not even Mike can do it because he as the wbf gentleman can't listen that hiphotetic problem through their BD/ID units when all the LPs they and we are listening where cutted through DD motors that all were/are speed servo controled .
So any trouble about servos must be reflected in the LPs we listen to and this never happens or at least is what Mike shared when listening through his BD/ID units.

The information I shared in my last two posts were unknowledge by Mike when he posted about.

I don't know with all the evidence in the subject what he could think today and maybe could be interesting for all of us that he can be so gentle to share his opinion even if he could/would confirm what he already posted. Could you?, appreciated.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.



Btw, @alexberger in this thread posted:

""    Yes, the belt drive have advantage of very low noise.
BUT, when you listen an orchestra,on one hand you can listen a 10th violin separately and other small details, but on the other hand the rhythm and flow of music is broken by belt drive momentary speed fluctuations. I think the rhythm accuracy and flow of music is much more important than small details.  "

Way interesting too.

rauliruegas

This what Mike posted:
"when we consider belts, idlers, and direct drive........2 of those have the choice of no servo’s."

Not true. There are belt-drive 'tables with servo control, such as the Oracle Delphi III that I once owned. Some SOTAs too, I think.

"Have the choice of." I did not say all belt drives are not servo controlled.
A synchronous motor will fight to follow the frequency it is given. As long as this is accurate the synchronous motor will stay right on unless it's torque rating is overrun which under normal usage is highly unlikely.
With the Sotas excepting the Cosmos and Millennium you have the choice. They come standard with a synchronous motor and synthesized power. I would not add the Eclipse package. IMHO it is a waste of money. Spend it on a better cartridge.  

Dear @cleeds  : @mikelavigne  was refering to the BD/ID model TTs he owns today: Saskia and Csport against the excellent DD @jtinn  NVS Refrence TT he owns too.

I really don't know the kind of motors that uses the Saskia and Csport units.

R.

The Saskia is driven from a very complex motor controller that probably synthesizes the AC supplied to the motor, designed and built by Mark Kelly for the Saskia. Mark probably also had a hand in selecting the type of motor (AC synchronous, etc) to be driven by his controller. Maybe Win Tinnon will chime in here.

Mijostyn, I wouldn’t be so sure about the value of adding the Eclipse system to a modern day SOTA turntable, unless I had heard an example both ways, playing music with and without the Eclipse. Have you done that? If not, maybe you shouldn't dismiss the Eclipse system so peremptorily. I don’t know how good is the base motor and power supply, so I too cannot say for sure that the Eclipse would improve SQ over the base PS and motor, but I do know that the Phoenix Eagle/Roadrunner system was a very worthwhile addition to my highly modified Lenco, which was beforehand being driven from an expensive "motor controller". The original motor controller was way better than AC from the wall, and the Eagle/Roadrunner was another step up from that. (If you don’t know, the Eagle/Roadrunner form the basis for the Eclipse system as licensed by SOTA, except SOTA add their own special motor to that package.)