Yeah, I still believe his is marketing wording talking here.
Given how an inductor works, putting it in parallel with the line is counterproductive. The word "Parallel" here means connected from Line to Neutral or from input to output with the grid wire shunting it. Either way, it is counterproductive - in the first case, inductors don't work that way, in the second case, it is effectively out of the circuit path.
They could, and probably do, use a common mode inductor, which would explain using the word balanced, but the two inductors are still in series with the load, not in parallel with it and definitely not in parallel with the grid line. The RFI capacitors, MOV's, resistors, GDT's, voltage clamping diodes, will all be across the line. that is, connected from line to neutral.
Reviewers often quote manufacturer's literature in their discussion, so the fact that reviewers state the same thing doesn't mean they verified the claim using standard engineering electrical terminology.
Given how an inductor works, putting it in parallel with the line is counterproductive. The word "Parallel" here means connected from Line to Neutral or from input to output with the grid wire shunting it. Either way, it is counterproductive - in the first case, inductors don't work that way, in the second case, it is effectively out of the circuit path.
They could, and probably do, use a common mode inductor, which would explain using the word balanced, but the two inductors are still in series with the load, not in parallel with it and definitely not in parallel with the grid line. The RFI capacitors, MOV's, resistors, GDT's, voltage clamping diodes, will all be across the line. that is, connected from line to neutral.
Reviewers often quote manufacturer's literature in their discussion, so the fact that reviewers state the same thing doesn't mean they verified the claim using standard engineering electrical terminology.