Zu Druid MK IVs vs. Essences

08-19-11: Bjesien
Okay, check the listing for the Essence Time Warp Candy Gloss direct from Zu. Original price $10,200 selling for $6,000 new. Great deal since they are new at $6000, well under the list of $10,200.

The Zu site lists them for $4,000 a pair. The Essence goes for maybe $2,200 used if lucky.

Where does the list of $10,200 come in to play?

Answer:
The finish

Got it.

I tried to run the scenario so many different ways but got lost. I came up the with the high school friend who owned the 2k car with the 8k stereo. That didn't seem right. Next thought the opposite... 8k car with 2k stereo. That started to make sense.

You have enlightened me though that it is the paint job that we are going with more than any other part of the car.

That helps me clarify the situation but why would the owner/manufacturer discount over $4,000? Seems like building to loose money or a really great deal on a pimped out Pontiac Fiero.

http://benzs.blogspot.com/2008/11/fiero-kit-car-madness-murcielago.html

The Zu Essence with Candy Gloss went for $3300. What an awesome deal for the buyer.

I can't comment on the Essences, haven't heard them. However, I have heard the Soul Superfly and A-B'd them with the Zu Druid MK IVs. The Superfly in comparison was a little more linear and clearer and perhaps a smidge more bass. However, the Druids to me were slightly warmer and more pronounced in the midrange, with a very likeable midbass bump.

The bass has a very good presence all the way down to close to 40 Hz. Claims about inadequate bass are only valid when talking about below 40Hz. Otherwise, both speakers are wonderful sounding. Any musical sub like REL or MJ Acoustics should blend in very well. The Druids to me sounded a smidge more 'tubey' and analog.

I found that lower powered subs tend to blend in better, whereas the more powerful subs seem to take more power to 'get going' and then stand out a little too much. So, the MJ Acoustics REF100 or the REL Strata are good matchs.