I was not enjoying the performance until I ......


Equalized it with the Schiit Loki unit.  Miraculously, when I boosted the bass which was lacking, the performance came to life.  It’s amazing how my long term  prejudice against using an equalizer caused me to reject so many recordings on the basis of sound deficiencies.  Now I can enjoy previously rejected wonderful performances.
The Loki is an amazing device.  The ingrained bias against tampering with the “purity” or sanctity of the original artifact is rendered ridiculous with it.  It’s of such high quality that it does  not interfere with the 
good qualities of the original disc.  By manipulating the frequencies slightly you can, to use a cliche, turn a sows ear into a silk purse.
128x128rvpiano
I agree. I grew up with tone control equipped electronics and think they've gotten a bum rap. It usually doesn't take much adjustment to make things sound "right". Instead of trying to make the controls better we threw the baby out with the bathwater.
Well, I'll throw a wet towel on this. And, since I know Richard personally, I say this as a friend.
If you need to add/subtract via a tone control, then I think your system isn't in sync.
And, I don't doubt that adding some tone control won't help certain recordings, but I find it a bit of a band-aid approach, as you will have to adjust the settings with each recording.
Bob

The vast majority of the CDs I own sound fine. I couldn’t be happier with them.
HOWEVER, there are SOME discs that I really like, but avoid playing because of poor mastering or engineering. With the Loki, these discs can be rehabilitated by equalization so that they really shine.
I totally agree it would be ridiculous if you had to adjust the settings on everything you played. It would be foolhardy. That’s not the point.
The point is, you shouldn’t have to suffer listening to discs with aberrations just to prove that equalization is a bad thing.