2. misc-audio
  3. 163953-89202

Reference Recordings

Am I the only one who doesn’t like the sound of the highly touted Reference Recordings.  While there are some exceptions (e.g. Prokofiev “Alexander Nevsky,”) I find the orchestral perspective on most of their discs so distant that the sound is muddled and sound staging practically non existent.
Anyone else feel that way?
128x128rvpiano
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
@rvpiano, 
I agree with your impressions of the RCA Living Stereo and Mercury Living Presence. They represent splendid examples of minimalist microphone recordings. They have certainly stood the test of time.
Charles 
fuzztone's avatar
fuzztone
5,635 posts
 
They got a nice sound in the Baha’i Temple.

Ya think Keith Johnson’s 3 channel recording history has anything to do with the lower presence of "soundstaging?"
unsound
7,332 posts
 
I really like the RCA’s as well. The Mercury’s not as much. The Mercury’s used 3 channels. For better or worse,  strictly 2 channel in my set up.
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
If I had to choose I'd prefer RCA over Mercury as well.
Charles 
flatblackround's avatar
flatblackround
279 posts
 
Yes Reference Recordings only sound good when played on MC’s system.
More to discover