Schumann Resonator


I got 2 of these from Amazon...careful that free returns are applicable.  I charged them up, turned them on and holy moly.....they do help with my system.   What I hear is clarity....space between instruments, a definite difference in upright and electric bass, wider soundstage...you know...all the good stuff. At first I thought it might be increased brightness, but no....it is still the same in that regard.  I still can't believe it, and will listen again tomorrow (saved the packaging for the return)...but today, I'm about to keep them.
128x128stringreen
I have a very good recording of Tibetian Bells. Might make a good test recording for use with Schumann Generators! Could be lethal peace and tranquility together!
In my experience Gong sound are very difficult for any system...But gong is so marvelous instrument and so simple one....Any system reproducing its sound must be good....
Great we’re now into conspiracy theories with "suppressed medical discoveries".
If you dont know already that half medical litterature is propaganda by big tech corporation...

Stick to superman comics....And to audio reviews....Or try to read about statistical science use and abuse....

If you believe that the " common good" of people is compatible with big tech corporation profiteering look at Texas situation now....It is not conspiracy but business as usual for Texas energy companies...Call me a conspirationist.... I dont give a damn....You can call me a "communist" if you want, i live in the more leftist part of Canada....





“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine” (1).

More recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572812/
I believe a single sentence can sum up mahgister:
Our mahgister has a very kind soul.
I believe a single sentence can sum up mahgister:
Our mahgister has a very kind soul.
I am sorry to contadict you.... I try to be kind... I am not always successful....I am too passionate to be always kind alas!

You are more kind that i will ever be and i have proof...

😁

Then stay silent or......Yes, it is a threat....
@thecarpathian
Love as an emotion cannot be scientifically quantified.
A machine that creates a specific resonance can.
Sorry, I have limited experience with androids

"The amount of knowledge we have about the universe is 0.0000....%"
You are confusing the word ’we’ with the word ’I’.
So if I say, "We are humans" for you I should use "I"?

"I don’t understand the source of gravity but I know it’s there."
The source of gravity is literally any and everything that has mass.
This has that is not the same as how or why
kennyc,
You made the analogy between the emotion of love and a Schumann Resonator.
I pointed out this is a false equivelancy. I have no idea why you are now alluding to androids.

Your statement that "we" have 0.0000% knowledge about the Universe is incorrect. ’We’ as in humans have a much greater understanding of the Universe percentage wise. If you personally do not, then "I" would be correct.
And again, no idea why you would call a single human "we".

You clearly stated you did not understand the source of gravity.
I gave you the answer.
I’m quite aware that is not the same as how or why there is gravity.
No idea why you felt the need to state that fact.