Schumann Resonator

@mahgister,

Good link but you could take its argument any way you chose.

In any case, external interference in scientific research ("flagrant conflicts of interest") cannot be a good thing. 

Or are scientific independence and impartiality already things of the past? 
Did they even exist then? Or ever?

In any case we must surely be at a stage of enquiry that's unprecedented in the whole of human history.

So many subjects now find themselves under an increasingly bright worldwide spotlight at the same time by so many people. 

From election conspiracies, the legitimacy of the moon landings, the relevance of the 7.83Hz Schumann Resonance, the supposed death of Paul McCartney, the assassination of JFK, 911, false flags, the covid response, flat earth proponents, the decades old digital v analogue debate, spikes v springs etc.

A kind of intellectual theoretical Darwinist battle is being played out on a daily basis. What will eventually emerge may well be the truth, or it may not. 

Hopefully some bright sparks with never before seen levels of accessible data at their disposal, will be able to make the same kinds of groundbreaking discoveries that the ancient Greeks were able to via sheer force of reason.


------

Skeptical of Medical Science Reports?Carlton Gyles  Oct 2015

'More recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.

Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.'

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572812/

larryh111-

First, Schumann resonance is an electromagnetic field not an acoustic signal. Second the amplitude of the field is on the order of 1 picotesla and can only be detected with highly sensitive antennas and instruments. The magnetic coil used to detect Schumann resonance typically consists of tens to hundreds of thousands of turns of wire wound around a highly magnetic core. Further, 1 picotesla is many orders of magnitude smaller than the earths own magnetic field. All this is to say the idea of a Schumann resonator improving sound is pure nonsense. However It does beg the question as to what a person thinks is true versus what they want to think is true. What do you think millercarbon?

I think we are talking about two different things. You are talking about an extremely weak field, and we are generating the same sort of frequency only about a billion times stronger. All you have to do is compare something as obviously simple as the circuit boards power consumption to figure that one out. You spent a lot of time Goolaging up factoids without bothering to understand a word of it. That is what I think.

Schumann Resonators over 12,000 views and coming up on page 6....who would have thunk it!

@mahgister,

Good link but you could take its argument any way you chose.

Thanks for your open mind being a glimmer of hope for others....


Just a word about truth: truth is something we must love and live under.... It is not reducible to the facts which are accepted or not by science or religions....

Truth is not only and mainly a value associated with facts, the so called "truth value" in the logical meaning of the word, truth is not reducible to facts in this world.... It is a light who shine through ANY world and through all beings... It is first and last an ORIENTATION of the heart and mind toward love and the absolute.... It is not also a religious matter.... The finger pointing the moon is not the moon... Truth could not be also the matter or the main  subject of a science without heart....





It is the reason why i like your post...

My best to you....




«Why did you count your money Groucho?»-Chico Marx

«I trust my mothers’s love and numbers only»- Groucho Marx

sokogear-

I think that is what MillerCarbon does. He knows in theory it improves the sound and does whatever he can in that regard. It's a free country. I like to justify any expenditure. I find it hard to beleive he can hear every single thing he's done and when removed he would notice it. Double blind test would be nice to hear. 

Double-blind testing is the refuge of tin-eared wanna-bees. I've demonstrated this so many times with so many different things over so many years it is hard to do anything now but laugh. I could tell you so many stories but now I don't even have to do that any more, just refer you to my System page where you can read Deborah's comment for yourself: 

During the middle of one song (I had my eyes closed) ,Chuck took the cables off the Cable Elevators; I immediately heard the sound become distorted and muddy. 

"Had my eyes closed". So in other words literally blind. Just want to be sure you caught that. Had no idea it was coming. Literally double-blind. I got so many of these, you don't even know. This one I love because she wrote it herself without even being asked. Beautiful. 

Every single thing in my system is like that. Nothing is there because: theory. Nothing is there because: reasons. Only reason any of it is there is because I tried it and heard it was better. Not teensy bit better either. The kind of better a woman listening intently finds startling. Yes every single thing is like that. Even the freaking rubber band trick. Don't miss that one! 

But hey, I get it. You have no idea. As much as is shown and described on my System page, I was just reading it, and surprised to realize it barely scratches the surface. Yes indeed I really can hear every single thing. You would too, if you had the time. You really should come hear it. For what some of this stuff costs it would be worth it to fly out here just to learn what is possible. For what you would save buying tweaks that work instead of running the upgrade treadmill it would totally be worth it.