Ok i give you something.... I am not competent for sure.... I am only an audiophile experimenting.... But explain to me how in the world we dont need a room?
Nevermind the recording technique used we need A ROOM not only a source...
Do you think we dont need timing and phase also for the acoustical waves in the room to optimize image and timbre perception also ?
With the same gear, the same source, i never had imaging and timbre....NEVER .... I worked the acoustical settings for months and the other noise sources and now i have plenty of the 2.... Then......
The room acoustic is central in audio and it is not a sum of bits....
I am perhaps totally wrong i will admit it ..... Explain that to me.....
And about my arrogance remember that my arrogance was an answering to your own about turntable users and other audiophiles....I admit my arrogance with you for sure you are right about that.... Admit your own arrogance....i will not name all the others you call liars or wrong....
By the way the question is not only about the way spatial positioning is recorded but also about HOW we recreate it in the room .... Even if the information of the spatial positioning is recorded rightfully in the source how can we enjoy it in a BAD room? I never enjoy it like i said BEFORE i installed my acoustic controls; same gear but different acoustical setting in my room and i now have natural timbre and imaging why?
It is not the BITS in the source that has changed, it the the timing and phase of the sound waves in my room that has changed (the electrical and mechanical noise were also decreased)...
Nevermind the recording technique used we need A ROOM not only a source...
Do you think we dont need timing and phase also for the acoustical waves in the room to optimize image and timbre perception also ?
With the same gear, the same source, i never had imaging and timbre....NEVER .... I worked the acoustical settings for months and the other noise sources and now i have plenty of the 2.... Then......
The room acoustic is central in audio and it is not a sum of bits....
I am perhaps totally wrong i will admit it ..... Explain that to me.....
And about my arrogance remember that my arrogance was an answering to your own about turntable users and other audiophiles....I admit my arrogance with you for sure you are right about that.... Admit your own arrogance....i will not name all the others you call liars or wrong....
By the way the question is not only about the way spatial positioning is recorded but also about HOW we recreate it in the room .... Even if the information of the spatial positioning is recorded rightfully in the source how can we enjoy it in a BAD room? I never enjoy it like i said BEFORE i installed my acoustic controls; same gear but different acoustical setting in my room and i now have natural timbre and imaging why?
It is not the BITS in the source that has changed, it the the timing and phase of the sound waves in my room that has changed (the electrical and mechanical noise were also decreased)...
Mahgister you don’t appear to have any idea of how recording works, or how spatial positioning is communicated in recorded music