A DAC that ought to be better known: RME


I just bought a RME ADI-2 DAC on the recommendation of some technological minded audiophiles on another site and am delighted with the sound quality and price point. It isn’t especially user friendly and the multi page user manual is complicated. Plus the DAC has equalization and a great headphone amp, all in a small package. I always thought the Exogal was a great performer but the RME strikes me as superior, especially considering the significantly lower price. I listen to a lot of chamber music and it conveys the timbre of the string instruments exceptionally well. Plus, for the first time in a long while I can actually read the screen and see what’s happening. If anyone out there is looking for a DAC this is worth at least investigating. 
128x128rtorchia
If you check out headfi forum they have an on going forum on the RME and most do not believe an upgraded lps will help. They say "RME doesn't recommend it" So I guess everyone believes different. I bought the RME and waited about 2 weeks for Teddy Pardo. Breaking it in with stock power supply I thought sound stage lacked and it was treble forward but that could have been break in. jjss49 I know what you mean by "zippy" no offense taken and RME was 2 dimensional and treble forward with no meat on the bones and most of all not engaging. Before the RME I tried the Qutest but it wasn't for me. I was looking to move on and sell RME. After about 6 or 7 weeks It became big and warm 3 dimensional with very inviting midrange and very smooth non fatiguing crystal clear highs. Crystal clear very transparent highs is something the MHDT can't do as well in my system. As good as RME soundstage became MHDT stage is a little better or different not night and day but very noticeable. I do find the RME responds very well to footers. I have the MHDT stock feet sitting on top of a preamp power supply with a fairly cheap USB and XLO signature output cables so it may be an unfair comparison while RME sits on Nordost footers under the maple and golden sound jumbos footers under the RME . I do find the MHDT can fall apart on fast complex fusion, jazz or busy music but can be more engaging than the RME at times certainly with small acoustic jazz which is very important to me. I think these dacs are very system dependent, what sound good to me sounds bad to others. Honestly I wouldn't want to be without one or the other depending on the mood I'm in. Sometimes I will listen to the RME for a week or so and then the MHDT for a week or 2 or switch between the 2 in the same night. I need to get the MHDT a better input cable and platform to see what happens, both the RME and MHDT source is Auralic g1. 
@paulcreed

go to garage1217 get 6sn7 and 6dj8 to 5670 tube converters they sell, then start tube rolling

it opens a whole new world of what the mhdt can do from its stock ge mini tube ... dunno the rest of your system but you should hear wonderful new presentations of the sound/music

have fun!
@paulcreed 
It's not clear to me from your post if you thought the Teddy made a difference? 
Mofojo, I did compare the Pardo vs stock after a few months of break in. Pardo expands soundstage, improved spl in the room, midrange became much more natural and put nice weight and body on the highs, it just made everything more musical, bigger and smoothed things out but your mileage may vary.

jjss49, I'm going to order the adapters just haven't got around to it. I have a lot of 6sn7's, ken rads, RCA gray glass and so on plus amprex, bugle boy,SQ's, valvo and many other 6922. I very interested where that would take the MHDT, thanks for the suggestion.

For the first time ever I started using XLR balanced cables and put them on the RME, replacing my usual RCAs. A professional audio fellow told me always to get used to a given cable and then change them over one by one to notice the difference better. I know this is a touchy subject but I believe I can hear a difference. So I am very inclined to the PS upgrade after a while.