If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires
Post removed 
Sound and music in particular is a very fragile thing. Does not take much to mess it up. Much harder to make better.....

Yawn,

do either of you think this sort of pi**ing contest adds anything to others’ enjoyment of their hobby?
Not by a country mile

Cease and desist if you please
I don’t start off with "water is wet" when I discuss swimming.
Using sound argument does not means using "common place" platitude...When discussing, precise meaning of words and concepts must be used and specified...

Water is wet yes...For you, but that does not explain ice cube....

But "biases" in a newspaper sentence or in your post is not the same that reading it in a research paper...WHY?

You called "timbre" perception a taste in audiophiles.... A pro musician going with my argument was called a liar by you about the "timbre" perception...
Timbre is not like you said only a taste or a color in the superfluous sense of something that is ADDED to the sound accuracy... This is false...scientifically false....



"Imaging" is not a pure recording engineering phenomena first, and even if it is related for his experience to the right type of speakers and their location for sure, explaining "imaging " like this will not do it because it is FIRST AND LAST an acoustical neurophyisolgical phenomena...

Then imaging explanation must be spell out correctly in the right phenomena ordering...



I dont need to argue with you to nourrish what you accuse me of suffering: "grandeur illusions"....I am not like you.... You need to bash all audiophiles here to nourrish your own illusions my friend... I bash no one here myself but i REPLY with arguments when someone attack i dont reply only with authority arguments and insults like you did....





«Why do you try to drink ice cubes Groucho?-Harpo Marx
«You water is not my water my friend.....»-Groucho Marx
Post removed