I have a feeling that it is already decided in the most of this group that whatever that Ted does will be correct and that the other guy will be humiliated.
According to one poster earlier, what Ted hears is not exactly what multiple other people hear.
Instead of offering whatever to the other guy, why not offer it to some impartial observers with no vested interest?
According to one poster earlier, what Ted hears is not exactly what multiple other people hear.
Instead of offering whatever to the other guy, why not offer it to some impartial observers with no vested interest?