My first streamer was a Naim that did not support MQA. I was very envious at the time of those who could run Qobuz and Tidal/MQA. I upgraded to a dCS and had Tidal and Qobuz for about 6 months. I tried and tried to think MQA was an advantage, but all I got in my ears was different, but not better. Tidal was also going for a buyer with different musical preferences than I. Now I only subscribe to Qobuz and have no concerns I am missing anything.
- ...
- 57 posts total
All meddling with the source signal introduces sound degradation, whether in the analogue or digital domain. Tone controls, bass & treble adjustment, speaker crossovers, Dolby, equalisers, click and pop eliminators, MQA-like processors. All the same. It is impossible to adjust the sound without introducing distortion. That is the reason for the unlifelike presentation that many people hear in digital, compared to the more lifelike analogue presentation. The main direct causes are DA converters and clock dither. These faults can never be fully addressed, as has been shown in the 40+ years since digital recording started. Simple is best, leave well alone. |
Clear thinker: The “faults” have been addressed. It’s got great sound and is somewhat ‘future proofed” with two MDC slots. I’ll take this in both the convenience of easy integration and huge selection of artists via Qobuz, and SQ that’s better than vinyl. https://nadelectronics.com/m33/ |
roadwhorerecords Just attracting you to giving up some cash IS their business model. I am amazed that they sold any Japanese CD makers on it. Submit them for testing before enriching probable fraudsters. clearthinker. The most common problem with "digital’" is the AD conversion at the originating studio in the first place. It is very difficult to make a purse out of a porcine ear. |
- 57 posts total