@ghdprentice Those most I would spend on interconnects would be in the 30-60 range per cable and I would tend to lean toward Blue Jeans Cable because it’s supporting someone making the cables in the United States. Anything above that is excess and un-necessary. I’m sure more expensive cables might be better but there’s that law of depreciating returns along with your hearing loss as you age. Everyone rationalizes after they make an expensive purchase that it sounds better but sometimes this is a placebo. Cables are that placebo. You might have an argument that analog signals degrade and are subject to interference and attenuation, but let’s not say that optical/toslink, RJ-45, and usb are the same beast because they’re not. The signals are digital and there’s a lot of snake oil about selling expensive cables from vendors saying they make digital audio sound better. Bullshit. Digital is digital, data is only flowing on 2 wires in the usb 2.0 spec and either it works or it doesn’t. (Usb does retransmit if it doesn’t get an ACK packet) Same with RJ-45, either it works or it doesn’t. Most home networks use TCP/IP and the packet retransmits if it doesn’t get there. That’s in the TCP spec. No expensive cable is going to change that when a cheaper shielded cat 5/6 cable will work just fine. If you have packet loss, the wireless signal sucks or if you have other issues with your network. (Bad cable/bad route).
Where are the young audiophiles?
I find it alarming that 95% of all audiophiles are seniors.According to a consultant at my local HI-FI store,young people don't seem interested in high-end equipment.They listen to music on their phone.Sooner or later, all the great neighborhood HI-FI stores will not be able to remain open. Kind of sad,don't you think?
- ...
- 144 posts total
- 144 posts total