mapman:
"The main value of specifications to someone who knows how to interpret them properly is objectively deciding which components to try ie which components are likely to work best in a specific system with others"
The above makes sense to me but this next part of your post I find confusing:
"Otherwise deciding what to buy is a total gamble with nothing concrete to validate buying decisions other than hearsay or pure guessing"
Seems to me that listening is very "concrete". And it's not unusual for reviewers to state that a component sounds really good even though it does not measure ideally in some regard.
What is it I'm not understanding about your post?
"The main value of specifications to someone who knows how to interpret them properly is objectively deciding which components to try ie which components are likely to work best in a specific system with others"
The above makes sense to me but this next part of your post I find confusing:
"Otherwise deciding what to buy is a total gamble with nothing concrete to validate buying decisions other than hearsay or pure guessing"
Seems to me that listening is very "concrete". And it's not unusual for reviewers to state that a component sounds really good even though it does not measure ideally in some regard.
What is it I'm not understanding about your post?