Modwright LS100 vs The followings

And I also completely agreed with charles1dad description on the Coincident statement, it is spot on as well.  Open, dynamic, transparent.

also, the Coincident seems more sensitive to the cables.  I use Neotech 3004 RCA on Modwright and they sound excellent, but I don’t like it on Coincident.  
Then surprisingly, the Coincident works well with Silver cables, it adds more punch, more slam.  

The Modwright gear is and has always been TOTL, amps, Pres’ and so on.

wouldn’t think anyone would part with the gear!

 Good stuff!

If anyone has any firsthand experience I’d be interested in “tone” comparisons to a few other preamps at about the same price point as the Modwright LS100:
LTA MZ3
Primaluna EVO300
Aric Audio Super
Backert Rhumba 1.3

@gte357s,
Thanks for your follow-up listening impressions and comments. You note the transparency of the Coincident Statement Line Stage (CSL). And you’re right, audio system synergy of components/cables are very key and will be exposed.

In my opinion the CSL doesn’t lack tonal density. It entirely depends on what it’s partnered with. The exceptional level of transparency allows the signature of each component and cable to be revealed/recognized. Tone can be leaner or fuller -meat on the bone. The CSL very likely has less of a "self" sonic signature than the Modwright LS 100 relatively speaking. So the LS 100 could add a bit of flavor sonically speaking. CLS more chameleon in nature.

Bottom line I don’t believe that you can go wrong with either line stage. Just depends on which approach you want to take. I will say that with the current make up of my system, tonal density and harmonic richness are strengths.
Which ever choice you make, best of luck to you.
Charles

@charles1dad 
what is the rest of your system?