Restored my dads R2R but no tape loop on integrated


My dad found his old Teac A-3300SX-2T in storage and I’m having it restored currently. I wanted to do some recording from my TT and eventually from a CD transport as well if I end up adding one. My integrated is a Cambridge Audio CXA81 with no tape loop (only a pre-out option).

Tape selector?

https://www.hifiengine.com/manual_library/sony/sb-500.shtml
https://www.hifiengine.com/manual_library/akai/ds-5.shtml

I found a few models like the Sony SB500 or Akai DS-5. My thought was to connect the Teac input/output to ‘Tape 1’, phono stage output to ‘Tape 2’ and output from ‘Source’ to a line input on my integrated. Would this introduce any type of feedback loop while recording?

This would save me from moving cables around but it also means that my TT signal is always passing through the switch even when listening to it directly. I’ve read that these older switches are prone to oxidization and require some cleaning usually as well as constant exercising of the switches.

I wouldn’t want to potentially degrade the sound quality of my primary listening source to allow recording to a R2R

Phonostage direct to R2R?

The other option would be connecting my phonostage output directly to the Teac whenever I want to record. But this would involve the hassle of swapping phonostage output from integrated to r2r and back. Also I would only be able to monitor the source using the headphone out on the Teac and the built in output selector switch.

Rethink CXA81?

Is there another option available outside of completely rethinking my choice of integrated amplifier? The R2R holds more sentimental value than anything so I feel like it would be silly to start swapping major components for an unexpected add-on.
jvonoldershausen
Post removed 
jvonoldershausen

The channel imbalance that you notice is due to the cartridge. I have seven carts that range from -.6 to +1.1 dB.(left) If you can’t balance it in the phono preamp (like I can) you will have to do it with the record settings. (Unless your goal is to preserve imperfection) Take a test record with stereo balanced pink noise or a mono LP to get a feel for the offset required. I used to record LPs setting max levels for the loudest part of the side (some search required) and then just let her rip.
Do you have peak LEDs with your VUs? If so it’s easier to set max level. Try some recording some acoustic like guitar or piano and see how much flashing (saturation) your ears can handle. Remember that loud signals also cause "print through." There is always a trade off between tape noise on the floor and distortion on the ceiling. Your job is maximize the fit in between, balanced. You can mitigate this with a dBx compander or dBx ll but this is a trade off also.
If you use dBx ll you ALWAYS need it for playback which is a p.i.t.a. because they used cheap ass switches that often fail for one or more channels.
I also used to record the needle drop and go back and record mute over it up to the start of the program.
Make sure you hand demag the heads often or you will end up with DC "bias" on your tapes. Either routinely or upon checking with a magnetometer. DO NOT lay tapes on speakers (same thing) A splicer is recommended for maintenance (leaders etc.)
If you do much recording I recommend you become familiar with setup, and acquiring test tapes - setup is dynamic. My deck has test tones built in.

https://rsdacademy.net/textbooks/AnalogCircuits/Part6/PageSetup.php?Page=41&FileName=AnalogAudio....

Have fun.
Even when everything is perfect, many a track, analog or digital, is slightly off and a very small balance tweak can make a surprising improvement, to both imaging and individual instrument/voice distinctions.

I love my Chase Remote Line Controller RLC-1, it's remote volume and remote balance a wonderful thing! None for low price now it seems.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/234035488157?hash=item367d9a259d:g:FOsAAOSwhNlgmIqc

S/N 120 db, no one can tell if it is in or out, I just went thru the same in/out listening process when I bought my Oppo CD player, and it just invisibly does it's thing. Intellectually, I want the simplest chain, but functionally, at no detriment, I'd be crazy to deny myself remote balance.
.........................................

It's good you know the system, the problem is only somewhere in the TT path.

It might be anti-skate as you suspect,

doubt it's VTA causing balance issue no matter what thickness LP is.

Could be a cartridge pin wire, DIN pin, rca jack, cable. Tedious, but get a piece of paper, draw the path, check/change only one thing at a time, 

..........................

buy one of these, helps with cartridge alignments,

and, for left/right balance: is it my anti-skate???? the smooth side will definitely let you SEE the effect of anti-skate adjustments as you make it. Spin manually, watch, adjust, spin, couldn't be easier.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/333319932993?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&...

After a week, re-check, is the arm holding it's tracking and anti-skate settings? That's why I prefer the dangling weight, pure gravity.
..................................

this LP (get the CD also) side 2, tracks 2 and 3, (you hear all 3 guitarists on those 2 tracks), it is my final anti-skate tweak, very revealing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friday_Night_in_San_Francisco


If your integrated has a processor loop, that will work the same as a tape loop.   To think that I gave away both a Teac and Sony R to R and a Sony ES DAT recorder 10 years ago kills me to this day.  I never thought tape would make a comeback. 
oldhvymec  
As usual you make little sense.  
The OP expressed interest in recording vinyl not remastering it.
Period.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I know, that's when you spouted off and said

" A "true" tape loop has nothing to do with EQ."

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Of course you took it out of context. I said EQ down stream before the recorder/tape. You can master a tape that's the whole point. To what DEGREE do you want to record?

A Remix is considered a master cut IF you wind up with an original when you're done.. Isn't it? I thought that was the point..

No matter the reason I wish the OP the best results, I was just offering what a TAPE LOOP was for. Not what you use it for.. There is more than one way to create a loop.. In this case for Tape recordings.. No different than for a CD. A dozen ways to spit those out too..

Most Macs still have tape loops, my C2500 does "Record in" and "Record out". Has onboard EQ for three types of tape EQs to..