Class D amps seem poised to take over. Then what?


I am certainly biased by my lifetime final amp being a Class D. But I know that after 30+ years of development, Class D seems to be on a high plain. I know there are now many, many companies focusing on Class D and, maybe, a good handful already as good as it gets. My Class D amp is as smooth and beautifully musical as a great tube amp and as punchy and detailed as a great SS amp. I am satisfied and done with my search. A class D amp has effectively taken me off the amp merry-go-round. It’s about time after 50 years. And, for me, this Class D is a milestone. Will all other classes of amps fade away?
mglik
@erikt   

You got it right. Class does or soon enough will only mean something to nit (or is it zit?) pickers.
The other classes just won't go away on their own. Class D is polling well but that doesn't assure they will actually win the race. Class D needs to invoke the Insurrection Act. All other classes, along with their owners, will be arrested on the spot. Problem solved.
Yes the D train is real.  No noise, what is the model of that Yamaha int amp? 

Class D started as the "beyond meat" of amplification designs.
Now, that’s funny. But, looking at the Technics, they’re not using an off the shelf Class D unit but designed theirs in-house and turned the whole thing into one big DAC/power amp, again, not using any off the shelf DAC from another make.

A retailer told me that Technics is doing things other companies simply haven’t thought of. The only other company that comes to mind is Esoteric, who developed their own DAC architecture in some of their players. There must be some others but I haven’t researched enough to suss them out. FPGAs are becoming commonplace but this is another kettle of fish.

(grannyring, it’s a Technics SU-G700 and not a Yamaha)

All the best,
Nonoise