I'm STRONGLY debating buying either the remote or std. version. How good are these preamps? Are they competetive and truly high end? I've seen pictures with the covers off and they're extremely minimalist / simple, almost too much so? (I'm thinking power supply)
I have the non-remote version and tube changes have been fun to play with. I will mod it when the warranty period is over and may not feel a need to change it until everything else changes around it. I love it.
Quicksilver is not Mid Fi at all!!!! They play nice with most gear too. Preamps are so tough to “A” / “B”, it’s not like hooking up two sources and toggling back and forth. Call Johnny at Audio Connection in NJ...
I agree. Note I put it in quotes. Directed at the poster who called Quicksilver mid-fi. Might have been another thread. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I WASNT ranting at you.... just the Mid Fi reference in general. I understand... Quicksilver is definitely underrated. So good for the money.. .Im sitting here listening to my Mid Monos and asking myself "why am I buying a new Amp?
I'm having a 300b amp built but will be keeping the QS for sure. They will do duty in a second system. If Mike built a low powered SET I would have bought it. He did actually, several years ago and they are quite rare.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
