3 New UBER Decks - Is this Turntable's SwanSong? 🦢


Michael Fremer has recently reviewed three new turntables designed to be the 'Last Word', 'Cost no Object' STATEMENTS!!!!........Do I recall hearing this claim before??
I love Mikey and have followed (and trusted) him for decades.
He has been the longest and foremost published 'champion' of the superiority of vinyl (uber alles) in the world.
I am thus ecstatic that he has been able to listen and compare these decks in his own room, with his own equipment virtually side-by-side
It's almost a 'given' that he will be the ONLY person on earth given that privilege....

So what Mikey HEARS.....is indisputable

Given his 'character' and desire for accuracy and honesty.....years ago, Mikey started including some 'objective' measurements in his turntable reviews.
These measurements were done utilising the Dr Feikert PlatterSpeed App which has since been discontinued.
As the App only worked with the Mac iOS of many variations ago.....Mikey has kept an old iPhone which can still operate the App.
The PlatterSpeed App had a few technical limitations.....
Foremost amongst these, was its dependence on a 7" record with an embedded 3150 Hz Frequency track to produce a test-tone which the App could process through its algorithm to produce the graphs and all the corresponding numbers.
To stamp hundreds of 7" discs with perfectly 'centred' HOLES is a nigh impossibility.
It's almost impossible to do it with a 12" disc!!!

This means that ALL the figures produced in their Chart Info are dubious and mostly UNREPEATABLE!!!!
I have Chart Infos for the same turntable/arm combination but with the 7" disc moved slightly producing different figures.
I even have Chart Infos produced with the same turntable but different arms ALL with different figures (the arms are in different positions surrounding my TURNTABLE).

So what is my point......?
The GRAPH produced with the PlatterSpeed App is accurate and USEABLE when looking at the 'Green' Lowpass-Filtered Frequency.
If the hole was PERFECTLY centred.....this 'Green' line would be perfectly STRAIGHT......but only if the turntable was maintaining its speed PERFECTLY.
The wobbles in the 'Green' line are due to the hole's eccentricity as well as any speed aberrations.
So the best performing turntables are those with the most constant and even wobbles approaching as closely as possible a STRAIGHT LINE.

Now the SAT Direct Drive Motor is actually the same as Technics developed for their latest SL-1000R except with some bespoke modifications.
It appears that SAT have corrupted what is a very good DD Motor unit....🥴

Mikey says that the OMA-K3 produced the best PlatterApp figures of any turntable he has tested 👏
Does this mean that the OMA-K3 is the most accurate turntable of these three decks.....or maybe of ALL turntables?

Mikey can't (and won't) test and review products from the past which are no longer produced because that's not his job!
But wouldn't it be great if someone WOULD review products from the past against the modern equivalent?
Classic turntables with reputations....gravitas...like the legendary EMT 927 and Micro Seiki SX-5000 and SX-8000.
And what about the NOW lauded Japanese DD Turntables from the '80s...the 'Golden Age' of Analogue?
  • Technics SP-10Mk3
  • Kenwood L-07D
  • Pioneer P3
  • Victor TT-101
  • Yamaha GT-2000
Because we know that Direct Drive is now 'Flavour of the Month' for the new Uber Decks due to their superior speed accuracy....a 'Flavour' that started with the legendary Rockport Sirius III.
But what about Belt-Drive units like my 20 year-old Raven?
So much for science and technology.......

We can do things today that were only dreamt of even 10 years ago
Except learn from history, harvest experience, expertise and craftsmanship......

Here endeth the Sermon for today 🤗


halcro
@antinn, great example of a proper review. Now if all tonearm reviews were done that way we might be able to draw some meaningful comparisons. My only complaint is that the V15 was too compliant for the Tri Planar. My own experience with damping brushes was frustrating at best. 5 Hz is too low in everyone's book. No wonder bass performance suffered. Not sure how they crammed a Tri Planar on a Sota. Donna insists it does not work without significant modification but maybe that is just the more current versions.

I am going to agree with audioman85, dover for the most part, clearthinker and rauliruegas. 

I am not so sure that vinyl is here to stay. Most of us older audiophiles have large record collections which makes owning a turntable mandatory.
The people around at the time record sales exploded are now older, their kids are on their own and they have much more money to burn. While it is true that some young people are getting into vinyl, far more are getting into digital. I won't be around to see the outcome consequently I really do not care. If I did not have any records I doubt I would buy a turntable on the other hand people who point at all the problems with vinyl reproduction have obviously not heard a top notch turntable with a modern stylus profile set up correctly playing a clean record. It always amazes me how good this can sound.

IMHO the Nak TX-100 was overkill in the extreme. Typical Nakamichi. Shifting the center of the platter is going to alter it's balance which in time will do a number on it's main bearing. Many of us laughed at it. Off center records are a problem and can be quite audible. My solution was quite simple. I returned the record as defective, and kept returning them until I got a copy that was decent. 


Re speed stability.
As has been noted, the numbers produced by the platter speed app vary from test to test. This depends upon how the tester placed the record on the spindle, there is a small amount of clearance, so the record can appear to have different amounts of eccentricity each time it is placed on the platter. Also it depends upon when the test is started relative to the point at which the arm is swinging in and out due to the eccentricity. There will be a different reading if the test started when the arm was at mid swing compared to if it was at the inner or outer extreme. You can see the impact of this on the green trace at the start of the plots. Some show an uptick or downtick at the zero second mark due to the arm being at or near full excursion, (AF0, XD1, AC-2, 1000R, K3), where one is neutral with the arm’s swing more or less at its mid point (TT-101).This biases the low pass numbers in favour of the TT-101. The length of time the test runs also impacts on the final outcome. Then there is the low pass filter that is applied to the raw data, this designed to remove the impact of the records eccentricity. It is somewhat a blunt instrument in that it also removes key data about the platters micro speed stability within each revolution.
It is possible to do multiple tests and pick the best or worst numbers to highlight whatever point you are trying to make.  A reasonable conclusion is that beyond a certain point, the numbers produced are of interest but are not particularly robust data.

But what is pretty consistent and robust from test to test is the yellow trace. (amplitude aside as mentioned above due to record/spindle positioning) The platter speed app is interesting in that it first plots the CARTRIDGE OUTPUT as a function of frequency with respect to time.
In a perfect world where the signal generator sent a constant 3150hz to a perfect cutting lathe, we stamped a perfectly concentric record and played it back on a perfectly speed stable TT, we would see the yellow trace as a straight line at 3150hz
But of course, this is impossible and one of the major deviations from perfection is that the record spindle hole is not in the centre. So if all other parameters were still perfect and we considered a non concentric record, we would see the cartridge output a clean sine wave, symmetrically centred about 3150hz with a constant amplitude per cycle.  IOW, a TT producing a yellow trace that is a badly distorted sine wave is NOT speed stable, although its speed could average 33.333.  I hope that this is self evident.
The program then puts this raw trace thru a low pass filter to remove the effect of eccentricity, we now have the green trace. But what the low pass filter does is filter distortion as well. This distortion is a graphical representation of rapid speed changes. It is no longer visible and what we are left with is a smoothed average which is used to compute the low pass filtered numbers.

A far more accurate and useful metric of the speed accuracy of a TT is to simply look at the raw yellow trace, ignoring the numbers. How close is it to the ideal symmetrical, clean, constant amplitude, sine wave?  Some of the TTs mentioned in this thread, plot significant deviation from this ideal with quite rapid and frequent speed changes.
Remember that the yellow trace is the cartridge output plotted as frequency with respect to time, any distortion of the sine wave is a change in frequency, thus a change in speed. These speed changes would be superimposed on any music that was being played. With this in mind, I invite you to look again at all of the speed plots

.
On top of this conundrum, the platter speed app does not load the system dynamically since the 3150hz tone is of constant amplitude.  This is a whole different set of  equally important measurements. We do not listen to constant amplitude, single frequency tones.

BTW two of the TT plots posted have a low frequency oscillation with a period of approximately 9 seconds. A low frequency oscillation with a multi second period like this is not uncommon and is very difficult to eliminate.

Cheers,


Thanks, Richard.
Mijo, people like you put Tower Records out of business. That was a joke, but my point is that one cannot act as you suggest these days in the USA due to the dearth of brick and mortar LP stores. The ones we do have are primarily selling used LPs, each of which is unique. I don’t think one could get away with such buyer behavior doing business by mail order. Good story, though.
Technics SL-1200 MK7

   Will last 40 years with minimal maintenance,....yes please. 
   The asking prices for those TTs’ is just astronomical, and overpriced.  Search most expensive audio gear, some of this stuff is mind blowing.