HiFi vs MidFi

mahgister, not doubting your claims re totality of listening experience, but surely you would agree that some components achieve better resolution than others, that some move more air than others, and that these differences are audible?

Yes you are completely right....There is a difference between A Sansui Amplifier of the golden Era and many other amplifier not so well designed for example...

My point is ONLY that acoustic control and treatment, if they NEVER coud replace the NECESSITY for  good designed produts by themselves, will anyway by themselves give you this 50 % of the S.Q. that NO GEAR could do by itself alone....( This % is a "metaphor" conveying my message not a measurable fact but this % mirror my own experience )

Acoustic is the queen and the working gear are the 7 little working dwarves...

Perhaps think of this analogy.    

Consider MidFi like watching Avatar on DVD and HiFi like watching it on BluRay.    

Until you know the difference, you are loving the experience. But once the Pandora's box of HiFi is opened, there is no going back.    

So HIFI poisoned Snow White?  I'm so confused

So HIFI poisoned Snow White? I’m so confused

In a way "sometimes" yes....

when Hi-FI is associated with hype and money in place of the necessary acoustic solutions yes....

Thanks for your enlightened confusion....

High-Fi or Hi-End + acoustic = audio experience

The best high-end in the world is not complete without acoustic, without a room designed for it...

Maybe you didn't see my earlier post.  Defiantly not about expense. 

http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews2/caintuck/2.html

Prices have gone up since this post but they still exist.


I believe that everything matters even the blue birds