Update From Ron New Day Record Covid 19 Battle

You want to believe cranks and crackpots because they align with your chosen world view, have at it. It’s free country. But don’t drop your drawers in public, metaphorically, and expect people not to point you out and laugh. They/we live in a free country as well.

It is clear that you are UNABLE to produce arguments only strawman attack against all people i just listed because they dont think Kennedy is a crackpot...

you have probably not read a single articles by any of them...I read many none is an idiot... Assimilating them all to be crack pots is beyond any rationnality...

Your case is closed...

No conflict of interests in the worst greedy businees and the more corrupt on earth with bank business and you see nothing about conflict of interests?😊

Are you a failed stand-up comic?

By the way how do you know my world view?

You cannot, your brain is it seems divided in 2 : pro-vaxx or anti-vaxx...

i dont work with binary opposites and ready made explanations...

@Glory

"Go get another shot and a few more booster. You're so smart you know what is injected into you. You have the list of ingredients right in front of you on a piece of paper. Oh, you don't know? Trust the science and let them fill you up with whatever it is but it's not a Vax."

LOL! I love this one, a truly ubiquitous classic - @Glory, hate to put pin to balloon, but you have no idea what's in any branded drug you get, or in any food you purchase. You don't know the sources of any of those materials, their purity or impurity profiles. You don't know what's in the water you drink everyday.  I doubt you're a toxicologist, and if not, you have no idea of the import of any of those materials, and couldn't assess them anyway since you don't know the concentrations so you can't calculate a maximum dose.

And you can holler "it's not a vax" all day, it is a vaccine, and you're continually trumpeting your ignorance.

Q called, he said RFK Jr is not to be trusted.

@mahgister

Are you reading comprehension challenged? You cite a crank, and then cite a number of folks who's articles you've read - or claim to. You ignore that *I* have defined Kennedy as a crank, that informs *MY* opinion of your position and predilection. You can agree not not at your whim, makes no difference.

You ignore that when one, such as yourself IMO, reads to validate, not to educate, the conclusions drawn from such "research" are totally suspect.

You cant emulate a petulant child in declaring "Your case is closed..." as though you have some say in the matter, but sorry to disabuse, you have no such superpower.

Im not sure Maghister claims he read those articles, I believe he may have cut and pasted RFK Jr's bibliography.