The Big Misconception About Electricity

I consider relentlessly posting things without a nary of due diligence on almost anything you are posting, posting things from people recognized pretty much as frauds, and letting emotions eliminate your ability to take a balanced and accurate view to be arguing in bad faith.  If you are going to do that, you should not expect those you argue with to "play fair". Good faith is a two way street.

You are not even able to think rationally... AKA reacting rationnally to an argument....Your goal is making a point not truth, because you already own truth....Your behavior was the same with others in a thread about Russia and Us defense....

Who decide that what i posted about Tesla is a fraud?

You?

You are the sole arbiter of what is true?

If someone read all your post about Tesla his conclusion will be that you are a clown OR of very bad faith...

In the beginning i cited for a fact the eidetic memory ability of tesla, you deny them and never recognized to be wrong about this FACT... Even after i proved to you with FACT that eeidetic memory exist and some peoiple are able to draw cities from the air after a first sight and WITHOUT ERROR...

The only arguments you come with to diminish and slander a great man were ridiculous: someone discover something analogous few time before or he was not alone in the electrical field, or all what is said about him by fringe people made him a fraud.... You are not completely stupid but because i know that you are "relatively intelligent" and if we study your behavior with people i must conclude that you are a contemptuous man with a very limited perspective on things...

Myself i say what i think in good faith, i dont mock others and i try to let all perspective to be listen to...

saying to people " bye bye" is your method of discussion when you lost argument or patience because of being pointing wrong, because you consider they are stupid? NO because you are always right for sure....Almost all people are stupid for you even before beginning the discussion....Save very few...

I consider people here, human beings, i like to argue but with arguments and not to win a point ONLY and ESPECIALLY recognizing when i am wrong on a subject when i know i am pointed wrong by fact ... It is not your case....Fact are a tool for you not an arbiter...

Anyway speaking with you is stupidity of my part, anybody reading you know all that... You are too old to discover respect and truth.... You know too much and too little...You give RESPECT TO THOSE very selected who speak the same....

Repeating Tesla is a tinkerer or a hack made not much reason to convince someone of your seriousness, it only illustrate your misconception coming from your irrational reaction to undersground culture where Tesla is a symbol, but being a symbol in a fringe movement dont make Tesla an exagerated phenomenon in the history of invention AT ALL....

Speaking with someone who can never recognize that he is wrong had no interest at all...

Someone who speak with contempt with people who he consider wrong because he himself is always right even when pointed wrong by evidence, or at least debatable, is like an idiot painting himself in a corner in plain sight...

for sure this will not affect you at all.... Guess why?

Like you said to someone all this is only a circus and you are the pist master for sure....Why taking all this seriously? because some idiot like me take truth seriously....

Why do you act like this is simple... You know more than anyone and anyway the majority of people being stupid you dont feel shame when your behavior is only sarcasm and contempt why?  Why being ashamed? Your are not even conscious of your behavior...

Enjoy the circus....

I dont....

I consider relentlessly posting things without a nary of due diligence on almost anything you are posting, posting things from people recognized pretty much as frauds, and letting emotions eliminate your ability to take a balanced and accurate view to be arguing in bad faith.

The irony of @cindyment taking others to task for failing to do their due diligence and "arguing in bad faith" is incalculably deep.

Hey whippy, still waiting for your analysis beyond talking points.

Mahgister, I easily poked holes in many of your (and other) claims. It was not hard. When you simply post statement lacking nuance or history into what happened before or who was actually involved, it is easy. Frankly, I should be commended for even finding claims in the pages of what I am sure comes across to many as ramblings. I suggest you would accomplish far more with less, and more succinct and targeted words.