Can't help you because I have not used the Mogami speaker cables, only the Canare. While I am not using them at the present time, a search here will find that a number of users believe the Canare is a good not uber expensive cable.
Mogami 2921 Bi wire vs Canare 4S11 Bi wire Opinions
We all know the addiction to this hobby. Well I'm looking for opinions comparing these two speaker wires. What kind of a change do you think the Canares would bring? Your thoughts will be appreciated. I know that trying the Canares would be the best answer.
My system:
NAD C 658 Preamp with HDMI module.
Parasound Halo JC5.
Audioquest NRG-Z2 Ac power cords for pre and amp.
Velodyne HGS 10 sub.
LG 65 inch TV.
Arcam DVD/CD.
Mogami XLR's By Jerry at 10 Audio. Replaced with Morrow Audio MA4's.
Audioquest Cinnamon 48 HDMI cables.
Audioquest Greyhound Sub cable.
Mogami speaker wire 2921.
Speakers are Bi-wired.
Sonus Faber Olympica III.
I have only used the Mogami 3104, but I doubt it would be much of a change. |
Probably no noticeable difference in the sound of the two types of cables but if you are running the cables internally bi-wired using only one cable per side you may hear improvement by using two separate cables (i.e., more copper) per side. Here is a termination method for the Mogami wire. You “might” also hear a difference using a solid core wire, which you can try inexpensively as described here. |