Making speakers sound tonally similar with an equalizer

Evolution for one million year make us focus on specific timbre voice recognition not on flat frequency response...

Mechanical equalization of a room with our EARS is better than electronical EQ with a mic...It cost nothing...Save a dedicated room...It is more fun to tune and more powerful for improving S.Q....

It take time for sure, many weeks and many months of listening experiments to tune it....

Way more gratifying than buying a tool which will make your sweet spot not so  useful  because located in millimeter... I have 2 sweet spots a few inches large in my small square room so good it is impossible to chose only one...

Isn't a flat response curve what a speaker designer is striving for for most accurate reproduction?

This is correct. The problem is that for the most accurate reproduction of recorded sound you want the speaker-room combination to be flat, or tuned to the house curve of your choice. Once you place a speaker in a room the anomalies of the room give you anything but a flat curve. The amount of peaks, dips and nulls created by the room can be rather astonishing.

An e.q. is a tool that can be used to electronically address some of those anomalies, usually at a cheaper cost than room treatments, with decent results. An e.q. can’t do anything with a null but it can smooth out some of the peaks and dips which can make for a more enjoyable listening experience.

As for your original question; in theory it probably could but that is not the use an e.q. was designed for.

@gosta 

@holmz 

haha. I'm with you. But why put money, time and efforts into a bad speaker?

If you're a diy'er it's another game

1. If one had an either/or choice between radiation pattern and FR, then one can fix FR with a DSP.
2. If the speaker (as a whole) sucks, but the drivers are good… Then one could redo the passive-XO as an active-XO
3. If one had a choice between a passive-XO and an active-XO on a speaker, then maybe they would choose something that could have a s/w patch applied to it?

There are probably some other corner cases.

I am using some last millennium speakers and will be trying the DSP on them.

I may really be the odd man out, but I'd think absolutely no way two different speakers will ever sound the same even if equalized properly, but for an entirely different reason.

Speakers of the same type sound very different due to design and engineering.

Forgetting types of speakers entirely (box, planar, omni, etc) if you compare two equalized conventional box speakers (eg: twtr, mid, 2 woofs) they'll sound different because of how they work mechanically and move air, even if their respective frequency responses are the same.

Wilsons don't sound like Sonus Faber or Dynaudio or Revel, and keep going. If they did we could all drop $2k on a pair of floorstanders and an equalizer and then make them sound like Rockports.   (what a great dream.....  :-)

As others have said, the only parameter that you can get to match, is frequency response.

But there are so many other parameters to take into consideration.

Just one example: different drivers have differences in: resonances, transient responses, dispersion, breakup, etc.

So, even if one were able to match frequency responses very closely, one speaker would probably still be better than the other with respect to: transient response, imaging, cone breakup within audible ranges, etc, etc.

Also, cabinet construction will not change. So, a resonant, poorly damped cabinet, adding it’s own set of distortions and inaccuracies, will still be there. Matching frequency response will not improve waterfall plots.