Why do I need power management if I have a great power cord?

Holmz, there is no future in trying to have a cogent discussion with a person that misses 90% of the conversation to dwell on 10%. You are obviously so much smarter than I am.

To quote directly from one of many reviews on the Xs300: "The Xs 300 mono amps were not only better sounding in every respect than the XA-160.5s, but they had nearly twice the power: 300 watts into 8 ohms, 600 watts into 4 ohms, and 48 amps worth of peak output current."

Let’s take your analogy to the opposite side of your argument. 900W represents 7.8A @ 120VAC. 24AWG wire has a current rating of 8A. Are you willing to use 24AWG on the Xs300? Ask yourself why Nelson would use a Neutrik powerCON rated for 32A @ 250VAC.

 

Holmz, there is no future in trying to have a cogent discussion with a person that misses 90% of the conversation to dwell on 10%. You are obviously so much smarter than I am.

How do you arrive at concluding that I am smarter than you?
I am just trying to understand here, and make sense of the physics.

What is wrong with me only needing further explanation of 10%?
Maybe I got the other 90%

Let’s take your analogy to the opposite side of your argument. 900W represents 7.8A @ 120VAC. 24AWG wire has a current rating of 8A. Are you willing to use 24AWG on the Xs300?

No!
would probably use whatever cable Nelson provided, or I would ask him.

Ask yourself why Nelson would use a Neutrik powerCON rated for 32A @ 250VAC.

The output of the amp needs to be larger speaker cable because the voltage is lower and there the current is higher for the same wattage.

The PowerCon is a great connector. I think that they only come in 32A, and that covers most all professional needs. Is that between the seperate power supply and the amp? Or is it from the wall to the amp? If it is “between” then it makes sense as the separate box is probably supplying 50V “rails”, so it needs be higher current capability than the 120v side is.

If one is using a 12 gauge wire for the speaker, then the incoming power, being at 120v, should not need to be bigger than 12 gauge (If we assume that the amp was 100% efficient). The amp is not 100%, but the 120v is a lot higher than a 50V rails so the current will be lower on the AC side.

The whole thing about 2 gauge coming to the house, is to cover things like ovens and dryers which need huge amounts of power/current.

a 1kW hair drier or 900W amp does not need 2 gauge.

@bruce19 

So my observation is that a blacker background on a tv does not make the programming better or worse. However if you focus on the blackness of the background you can make yourself unhappy with your equipment. Is that a smart thing to do?....Is there such a thing as 'optimal stopping' in audio? I think so.

I would agree that there is such a thing as optimal stopping. What I have found recently -- by adding a relatively inexpensive linear power supply to my streamer -- is that the content (or "programming") *did* get better because I was able to hear instruments and notes that were not previously available to me. If that occurred by adding better power to my whole system, it would be quite reasonable to do.

So,  perhaps, one metric to answer your excellent question -- roughly, "When is it optimal to stop improving the system?" -- is this: *when no more content is added or improved significantly.* Or even, *when I cannot justify spending this money, here.*

Knowing when to stop is kind of a judgment call which comes down to each of us. It's that same part of us that knows when to stop eating at an "all you can eat" buffet!

@holmz 

Exactly so, A large,  fast,  over spec’d capacitor bank in a power supply is the key. 

“ 

The capacitors only get filled up when they are at or below the voltage coming out of the transformer-rectifier-regulator. That physically is happening in a rectified sine wave that operating at 120 Hz. So there is a great deal of time (maybe a 1/4 of the time), where the AC is NOT feeding the capacitors any DC.

The power supply in an amplifier is holding DC and buffering the AC to provide that energy reserve..“ 

There exist electrical-magnetical distortions and crosstalk induced by the gear and there is also distortions and acoustic crosstalk induced by the speakers/ room / two ears relation...

I will explain soon the psycho-acoustic geography of my room in my acoustic thread... 😁😊

"When is it optimal to stop improving the system?" -- is this: *when no more content is added or improved significantly.*

The answer to the question when stop upgrading is related also to acoustic treatment and control...And your own purse for sure...But price tag of the gear is overevaluated much in S.Q. experience and acoustic and psycho-acoustic underevaluated much... Then...

I was hearing new details about sound and more accuracy after acoustic devices tuning or speakers/room tuning...

There is also the acoustic cues and factors that cannot be given by the gear alone in an optimal way and ask for room treatment and control...

Especially listener envelopment/source width ratio and timbre....

This was my motto for years: dont upgrade before the audio system is well embedded in mechanical and electrical and acoustical working dimensions...

I myself for example add a linear power supply for my  dac with success and a lower noise level but the linear supply itself must be controlled  for his vibrations for example...I even add a "golden plate" on it (shungite+copper tape)...