to bi-wire or not?

All the speakers I’ve owned that had a no wire option benefited from them being bi wired . Some more than others. Usher be 718 was a totally different speaker 

Big difference on my Tannoy Canterbury, in favor of biwire. 

@nonoise Not sure I would change a thing.  that is a pretty heavy solid silver cable you have for your highs and it makes sense that the dynamic portions of the music benefit from it.  

The only reason to use the same speaker wires for both sets of a bi-wire is OCD.  If it sounds great, don't change it.

Jerry

Even when I've done asymmetric biwire, it's still been better than single wire. Just don't go TOO far off design principles or lengths between the two. For a while I used a 6 ft AQ Mont Blanc (12 AWG copper) on bottom and a 7 ft KE-4 (15 AWG silver) on top and it sounded great, competing on par with the more expensive AQ Redwood symmetric biwire. 

To those who say absolute symmetry is required - that "perfectly symmetric" signal is going through two TOTALLY different sets of drivers and crossover parts anyways. 

I've moved on to symmetric biwire and its great, but like I said I'll still take most asymmetric biwires over single wire. 

@carlsbad , too late! 
I've changed things since the last post and now I'm using some jumpers made by the same company that makes my speaker cables: Darwin Cables. 
Best set up to date.

All the best,
Nonoise