OP, definitely power amp first with emphasis on current. Then (I think) source with emphasis on isolation… shielding. Then in between.
Prioritizing Power Cable Upgrades by System Component.
I'm digging into the world of power cables and it is kind of amazing. The promise that a good cable can bring along with its price is both exciting and staggering.
There are several components that need some kind of power cable and upgrading them, for me, needs to be done in steps.
For those that have upgraded power cables, how would you prioritize between the pre-amp (tube), power amp (ss) and powered sub...and possibly even the DAC?
- ...
- 24 posts total
I'd probably agree with amp first, but then you only expose another weak link with each PC. In the end all equipment is important, but I guess you have to start somewhere, can only say I'm happy I'm done with it. I too keep previous upgrade cables, never know when they'll come in handy at some future date. But then I use this philosophy on everything in system, way too much audio stuff in house. |
@carlsbad - This sort of aligns with my experience of hearing a significant improvement with the $50ish W Audio power cable on my Pathos integrated amplifier, but not with my other components. |
Power amp, pre-amp, electronic crosovers, then signal sources: tape decks, CD/DVD payers, tuners, etc. Get good speaker cables and interconnects before worrying about power cables. Big improvements don't have to be expensive. Amazon lists serious power cables from $40. A used cable will save you $$ and not need break in. |
I would start with one known good cable from a reputable manufacturer rather than a throwaway that may or may not be the highest quality. On the amp. The difference you hear will probably motivate you to stay upmarket. I didn’t spend a lot, Straightwire pro thunder for my amp was pretty affordable and I was able to buy direct since there is no distributor in my state. I A/B tested with computer cords, the difference made me a believer. |
- 24 posts total