“Most everyone here understands there must be a balance between measurements and listening.”
I agree but then there are folks like OP who just can’t seem to comprehend anything beyond measurements, you know the type…bits are bits, 1’s and 0’s, etc. etc. It’s like having a conversation with a bot 😂
I was casually involved in the (given local moment of) creation of the fundamentals of AI training via English language structure, regarding the creation of software that could pass the turing test.
I was working with a mathematician/coder who ended up being hired as a mathematician by the given local world class university.
We were trying to create an effective administration program for websites that could integrate with the public, effectively. I had to help him understand how English language rules were also a form of variable complex code, and as such, were a core part of the coming interaction of software and humans. We were also live, in that coding, the feedback was instantaneous and daily. This was the early 1990’s.
As we move to having work forces being replaced by robotic automaton, the same is happening in the world of internet interactions. Eg, this bot design we were working on was also being picked up by things like the military, who had committed to ruling the airwaves, as it were, as their hundred year mission..
To be in command of the internet via bots, groups of bots, under the command of a given set of singular military personnel members (working in large groups, together). Enter Edward Snowden, et al.
That one person could command hundreds of bots (single bot core, multiple facades as ’persons’), maybe 2-5-10 connected to a given website, and to do spot problem work in the bot interactions with the public.
As the given AI becomes better, and better, the human aspect of correction or training, becomes less and less necessary and the programs become more independent and move toward being more universal in application. Not human, but ultimately predictable software, with controllable coloration and patterns. then we are dealing with the interpretation of human psychology in such areas. as the two meet and steadily integrate to high levels, we find that the give and take between the two begin to dance together and the mating is almost complete.
This is now fairly ubiquitous in some global circles of attempts in influence.
Twitter and Facebook spaces and other similars, like tiktok, can be of this nature.
This is the world we live in now, so don’t get caught up in on line interactions in those big swinging and swaying spaces. Try to stick to real world interactions for forming one’s opinions and ideas on ideals.