Good point.
We can all learn the lessons from the blatantly biased way the Twitter platform was run.
And does matter?
$30 billion+ says that it does.
The 0-60 of a Mustang can be objectively tested. Almost all things claimed to improve a stereo's sound are done via "because I hear a difference and I know what I hear."
Until audiophiles allow or at least accept blind testing, they'll likely never be taken very seriously. Especially when some believe stuff like these things (literally magic crystals) make a difference in a system. https://walkeraudio.com/?product=black-diamond-room-treatment-crystals
Agreed.
Audiophiles are already out on somewhat of a limb already but if we were to restrict debate and criticism we may just find ourselves hopelessly detached from the rest of humanity.
No doubt, some might even prefer it that way. Especially when they have a vested financial interest in promoting certain products.
However, the rest of us understand that this is a forum to discuss matters musical, and not a mere vehicle for untrammelled free advertising.
In any case, isn't it always better to allow the dear reader to take in the various arguments and ultimately make up their own mind?
It's all too easy to get sucked in by someone else's apparent enthusiasm, even if it seems to change month after month. In fact, this was the main lesson I learned after decades of reading hi-fi reviews.
Blind listening tests and comparison against long term reference products should be mandatory if reviews are to be anything other than mere flavour of the month opinions.
I understand that times are tough and it's important to support the audio industry. I love audio, and I want to see it thrive. Surely anyone who seeks to have access to higher performance playback equipment deserves the best chance to access it, don't they?
If so, then forums like this one can certainly do their part, but let's not kid ourselves that get rich quick fly-by-night scammers don't exist.