Why should audiophile deniers be allowed on an audiophile forum?
Why should we be subjected to audiophile deniers, on a site dedicated to audio?
It’s antithetical to the hobby and adds nothing to the pursuit. I want to quote something from another thread.
@djones51 wrote "exposing bull products like "audiophile switches, cables, fuses " and other highly questionable devices that serve no purpose"
What then, is the purpose of people with this agenda being on this site? To “expose bull products.” It’s fine for someone to post they tried a product and it didn’t work for them, but to dismiss entire product categories is not a discussion that belongs on an enthusiast forum.
Would a car enthusiast site stand for this type of post?
Try going on a Porsche forum, just for example, and posting that your Mustang is just as fast 0-60 and that others poster’s claims about their driving experience is “dubious.” See how long that will be tolerated
There are plenty of sites to poke fun at audiophile’s obsession with cables, power conditioners etc. Why does it belong here, especially when we can’t mute specific posters?
What’s next? Arguing that speakers that measure the same must sound the same and that we are all suckers for buying expensive speakers? I thought we got rid of trolling?
Isn’t it obvious with all the ASR related posts here lately we are being trolled?
A couple of months back I read a post here about someone that ordered a new cat8 cable from China. I tried it and posted back my fantastic results for others to benefit.
Personally that’s the kind of forum I’m interested in, not to come here to be challenged about what I hear and that since it can’t be measured so it must be “dubious.”
- ...
- 380 posts total
Nowhere in what I said did I mention "party" line. It is you who are injecting politics into this, not me. I've pointed that out to you repeatedly and yet you persist in lying. You're becoming quite the horses's ass, aren't you? That, and you're revealing a rather dark side of yourself that you're continually apologizing for when others correct or challenge you. Then you pretend to agree with them and go off topic, as usual, hoping they forget what you said. As for your insipid takedown of stochastic terrorism, it's nothing more than pseudo idealistic gobbledegook; random phrases and quotes like one would get out of a word/phrase generator run by AI. All the best,
|
This kind of post is your habit...At least i try not to insult people most of the times and i answer to arguments... I answered each one of yours... You call my answers arguments with no counter argument from yours save a label an "idealism gobblewick" or hypocrital accusation coming from your mimicking paranoiac discourse for your enemies or your foes, then ? Everyone is an ally or an enemies for you... Write to Daryl Davis and say to him he is " a room low IQ idealist " so to speak because he trust free speech and education over censorship of any kind... No need to write the name of your party affiliation to guess it nor the name of the party you despised... I say that to you because i hate political left /right discussions... they divide people...They made no sense at all now...America is dying from this puppets controlled theater ...Canada is dead now... I apologize when i am wrong by the way ... And i am sometimes wrong being imperfect...it is the reason why you read my apology... Are you surprized that i can be wrong? I am not... Call that hypocrisy if you want, others will decide ... But if by my own human weakness i give in to the tentation to insult you or anybody or if i am too rude in the heat of a discussion , i will apologize another time...It is the less i can do...
|
@nonoise + 1 |
- 380 posts total