I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.


I just can't clear my head of this. I don't want to start a measurements vs listening war and I'd appreciate it if you guys don't, but I bought a Rogue Sphinx V3 as some of you may remember and have been enjoying it quite a bit. So, I head over to AVS and read Amir's review and he just rips it apart. But that's OK, measurements are measurements, that is not what bugs me. I learned in the early 70s that distortion numbers, etc, may not be that important to me. Then I read that he didn't even bother listening to the darn thing. That is what really bugs me. If something measures so poorly, wouldn't you want to correlate the measurements with what you hear? Do people still buy gear on measurements alone? I learned that can be a big mistake. I just don't get it, never have. Can anybody provide some insight to why some people are stuck on audio measurements? Help me package that so I can at least understand what they are thinking without dismissing them completely as a bunch of mislead sheep. 

128x128russ69

I cannot resist to post this very deep and beautiful sentence:

 

«The topology of silence holds the actual information of biology and also in every complex system integrating the information of the universe.»

it is in the article i posted above...If you want to understand this sentence read the article...

A clue:

«We do it every day, it was not just part of science, how? For example, somebody asks you ‘What are you doing?’, you say ‘Nothing’ (peaceful tone), you could say ‘Nothing’ (furious tone) or you could say ‘Nothing’ (dreamy tone), so N-O-T-H-I-N-G, seven ‘ticks’ are there, but you change the time gap between the letters to give a completely different kind of meaning to another path. So your information is not hidden in the ‘tick’, it is hidden in the silence.»

Amazing mind!

Link all this to the non Turing programming described in the image above....

 

By the way, only this remark hold the key to the linguistic theory about the relation between phonetic and phonology....

I am interested by the musical origin of language hypothesis...

😁😊

 

«When we say clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock, then we simply say that no event in the universe could be expressed as a sequence of simple events. It’s not possible. Because they are 3D geometric shapes, events are connected one inside another topologically, connections are undefined, you cannot make an equation. So if you want to convert it into a straight line, as events happening one after another, you will not be able to do so, because you are losing the topological information of the geometric structure. This is where we actually challenge the very foundation of the information theory existing for the last century.»

 

 

«When we say clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock inside the clock, then we simply say that no event in the universe could be expressed as a sequence of simple events. It’s not possible. Because they are 3D geometric shapes, events are connected one inside another topologically, connections are undefined, you cannot make an equation. So if you want to convert it into a straight line, as events happening one after another, you will not be able to do so, because you are losing the topological information of the geometric structure. This is where we actually challenge the very foundation of the information theory existing for the last century.»

 

Thank God engineers are mostly using geometric shapes like triangular diode symbols, and circular summing junctions.
I pray that they continue with their craft independent of magic 🙏

 

The “beating of a dead horse”, is starting to resemble a Pegasus, or the winged horse that Rushdie mentioned in his “Satanic Versus” book.

 

Or the geometry is resembling something out of the “Three Body Problem” books, where a subatomic partial is unfolded in dimensionality.

 

They sound great in literary prose…

😁😉😊

I like the artistic variation anbd esthetic aspect of this one image of beating a horse compared to the other one...

it is appreciated...

But i am afraid that your brain slowly miss this paradigm shift which is why i post it...

These artcles are not related for sure to this narrow and useless debate about O and S....

Try to work your brain through you will thank me...

Or the geometry is resembling something out of the “Three Body Problem” books, where a subatomic partial is unfolded in dimensionality.

 

They sound great in literary prose…

By the the way, no this has nothing to do with Poincaré problem...

begin with microtubules reading and Non Turing programing....

Thank God engineers are mostly using geometric shapes like triangular diode symbols, and circular summing junctions.
I pray that they continue with their craft independent of magic 🙏

And No Alain Connes and Fractal time crystals has nothing to do with audio engineering ...

They are related to the very idea of what we call "sound" and music through frequencies and clock which are at the base of this author idea...

IT is really an earthquake paradigm change on brain reasearch... It will illuminate even hearing... I am interested by hearing theory...

It is also the first demonstration in 2014 by the writer of the book that Penrose-Hamerof hypothesis of the orchestrated quantum model maybe right if the microtubules exhibit non algorythmic and non Turing behaviour which the writer interpret as a new fractal time "computing" with simple geometrical form instead of bits and Q-bits...

it boggle the mind..

If you read his book and curriculum this guy is no joke...

The reason why he is not well known is simple:

All brain research is on a dead road if he is right.... Billions of dollars are at stake right now...

If he is right the only comparison between this guy genius and another moment in past history will be the beginning of physical modern science with Galileo ... Now the basic parameter will be no longer spatial but fractal time-like...

The definition of time will change completely...

It is so extraordinary than my head turn....

To a beginning of understanding about time no books will beat Chandra Kant Raju... His two books are the deal....After that we move in a more revolutionizing new mathematical description of time which is no more only with functionnal differential calculus in the Raju description but with non commutative geometry beyond even the mathematics of the Indian genius with Alain Connes deep work in nunber theory and the quantum algebra...

With Connes idea the brain scientist Indian work is illuminated...behind all the clocks fractals expresion there is a source of variation and change more deeper than time itself...

Here Connes and Penrose cosmology meet one another...

Ok i will not add anything to this my job is done for information transmission of this great news here...

😊

 

 

My main interest is how do we hear  and tune in and interpret sound with this spiral-like and non linear structure of the cochlea, my Ariane thread is the non commutativity of the tone scale ...What is music?

A richer information phenomenon for  the body/brain than anything we ever think of...

My deeperst respects to all...

 

IT is really an earthquake paradigm change on brain reasearch... It will illuminate even hearing... I am interested by hearing theory.

 

Those fellow appear like quacks not quakes.