XLR cables cost more… often a lot more. If I was relatively young I would go with balanced… component design is headed that way. But if I was on a budget you can save money on single ended. But as has been pointed out to be sure with your components, you have to try to be sure.
I tend towards being a cable denier, but I have never seen XLR cables that attract the multi hundred t multi thousand dollar figures like RCAs can.
It gets difficult when one has say, an XLR phono stage and RCA based amp and preamp.
Starting new I would agree that using XLRs would be a good choice.
Anyways, my question is: has anyone ever thought that single ended sounded better?given the 2 options. Im only referring to a truly balanced connection
My 30+ year old XLR based phono stage did not sound as good as my 10 year old RCA phono stage… but that did not have a lot to do with the RCAs or the XLRs.
I suspect that the Benchmark, Atmasphere (etc. etc. etc.) amps that are balanced would sound better than my amps. And they also measure better.
But I would not hesitate to run an RCA based preamp into them even if I had to use an XLR to RCA adapter.
One would probably need the same gear as balanced or RCA to make a determination, and I have seen at least preamp show more distortion products with balanced than with RCAs, so it is likely equipment specific??