Do you consider cables to be a "component" of your system?


Meaning, do you think that cabling (AC/InterConnects/SpeakerWire) should be considered a component that is integral to your system?

I have probably as much money in cabling and fuses as I do in most of my components (if not more).

Please, please, PLEASE don't tell me that cables don't make a difference. I disagree and there's nothing you can say or do that will change my mind, so save it for another thread, please.

I just wondered if you had to recommend a set up to someone (who wanted a nice stereo), would you consider cabling to be essential in your build price and your recommendations? If so, would you consider the cost of the cables to be on par with the cost of a component?

 

 

128x128coralkong

Yes, I do but I need to hear the system first before I put the final tune on it. 

I always upgrade speakers (every 2 or 3 cycles) first, then components, then cables, interconnects, power cords last. This reflects the typical degree of effect on tne sound. Occationally an interconnect or cable will have a large outsized effect… but not typically.

 

So, over time the interconnects would typically represent 10 - 20% the value of the component. I usually try enough different brands to make sure they sound the best. So, at this point my speakers cost $32K - cables $5K, average component cost $20K, interconnects $3K, and average power cord $1.2K.

I have tried a variety of interconnects. For instance, a $17K interconnect on a $17K component. The difference was subtle but important. I was not remotely tempted because a $34K component would have netted a huge improvement in sound … while tne same investment in interconnect was minuscule in comparison.

Will your system function without cables?  No.  So they are components.

Will your amplifier function without a fuse?  No.  So it's a sub-component.

Will your speakers function without special footers,  Yes.  So they are tweaks.